Kawahara K, Iwasaki A, Shiraishi T, Okabayashi K, Shirakusa T
Second Department of Surgery, Fukuoka University School of Medicine, Japan.
Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1997 Jun;7(3):219-22.
Our objective was to evaluate the usefulness and safety of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for performing pulmonary lobectomy in 11 patients with clinical NO stage I primary non-small-cell lung cancer compared with 11 patients who underwent a conventional thoracotomy. Treatment was switched to conventional thoracotomy in three VATS patients because of the involvement of interlobar nodes or incomplete lobar fissure. None of the eight VATS patients died or experienced serious complications during 12 months of follow-up. There were no significant differences in the intraoperative blood loss, duration of operation, or duration of chest tube drainage between the VATS group and the standard lobectomy group. We conclude that although VATS lobectomy appears to be safe for use in managing patients with primary lung cancer, it does not seem to offer any advantages over standard lobectomy.
我们的目的是评估电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)对11例临床NO期I型原发性非小细胞肺癌患者行肺叶切除术的有效性和安全性,并与11例行传统开胸手术的患者进行比较。3例VATS患者因叶间淋巴结受累或叶间裂不完全而改为传统开胸手术。8例VATS患者在12个月的随访中均未死亡或出现严重并发症。VATS组与标准肺叶切除组在术中失血量、手术时间或胸管引流时间方面无显著差异。我们得出结论,虽然VATS肺叶切除术在治疗原发性肺癌患者中似乎是安全的,但与标准肺叶切除术相比,它似乎没有任何优势。