Fox S B, Harris A L
Department of Cellular Science, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, UK.
Invest New Drugs. 1997;15(1):15-28. doi: 10.1023/a:1005714527315.
Numerous studies in many tumor types have demonstrated that quantitation by microvessel as a measure of angiogenesis is a powerful prognostic tool. However, the ability to exploit tumor angiogenesis as a prognostic marker is limited by the methods currently used for capillary identification and quantitation. This report critically evaluates all aspects of the techniques and their associated problems used for assessing tumor angiogenesis in tissue sections including the area of tumor assessed, the vascular parameter measured, the method of quantitation, the stratification of patients and the practical utility of computer image analysis systems. The potential of angiogenic factors assays, proteolytic enzymes, and cell adhesion molecules as surrogate endpoints for quantifying tumor angiogenesis are discussed and other methods for quantifying tumor angiogenesis are described. The potential clinical applications of these angiogenic markers in prognosis, stratification for adjuvant treatments (both cytotoxic and anti-angiogenic/vascular targeting) and other aspects of patient management is also discussed, particularly design of phase I and II trials.
许多针对多种肿瘤类型的研究表明,通过微血管定量来衡量血管生成是一种强大的预后工具。然而,将肿瘤血管生成用作预后标志物的能力受到目前用于毛细血管识别和定量方法的限制。本报告批判性地评估了用于评估组织切片中肿瘤血管生成的技术的各个方面及其相关问题,包括评估的肿瘤区域、测量的血管参数、定量方法、患者分层以及计算机图像分析系统的实际效用。讨论了血管生成因子测定、蛋白水解酶和细胞粘附分子作为量化肿瘤血管生成替代终点的潜力,并描述了其他量化肿瘤血管生成的方法。还讨论了这些血管生成标志物在预后、辅助治疗(细胞毒性和抗血管生成/血管靶向)分层及患者管理其他方面的潜在临床应用,特别是I期和II期试验的设计。