Drevs J, Schneider V
Tumorklinik Sanafontis, Freiburg, Germany.
J Intern Med. 2006 Dec;260(6):517-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2006.01727.x.
Recent findings about the pathomechanisms of tumour angiogenesis have led to new therapeutic options in the treatment of malignant tumours. During the development of anti-angiogenic drugs, reporting ranged from healing cancer to completely ineffective drugs. In 2003 the first anti-angiogenic drug was approved. Several anti-angiogenic drugs are still in the clinical phase of development. In contrast to identifying the maximal tolerable dose, determination of the optimal biological dose--reaching biological activity at lower doses--has become the main target in the early development of anti-angiogenic agents. This has been evaluated by different biomarker techniques. As a new standard in anti-tumour treatment, a better understanding of imaging in the treatment monitoring for anti-angiogenic agents is important. Studies of tumour angiogenesis by tissue sampling rely on invasive procedures, adequate sampling and painstaking estimation of histological microvessel density. Attempts to develop wound healing assays to correlate angiogenesis in wounds with angiogenesis in tumour have been made but are still considered invasive and correlation of healthy with malignant tissue is still of limited validity. Several soluble markers of tumour angiogenesis were detected in various malignant diseases and were evaluated for assessing their use as surrogate markers in tumour angiogenesis. Further, soluble markers were investigated for visualizing them as imaging tools. Combining both, new soluble markers and imaging techniques, developing anticancer drugs and monitoring of therapy success becomes a dynamic process in which finally the patients' individual response can be achieved soon. Time-consuming delays for anatomically based restaging procedures can be avoided. Characterization of soluble biomarkers as well as different imaging techniques such as ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography combined with or without CT are reviewed in this manuscript.
关于肿瘤血管生成病理机制的最新研究成果为恶性肿瘤的治疗带来了新的治疗选择。在抗血管生成药物的研发过程中,报道结果从治愈癌症到完全无效的药物不等。2003年,第一种抗血管生成药物获批。几种抗血管生成药物仍处于临床研发阶段。与确定最大耐受剂量不同,确定最佳生物剂量(即在较低剂量下达到生物活性)已成为抗血管生成药物早期研发的主要目标。这已通过不同的生物标志物技术进行评估。作为抗肿瘤治疗的新标准,更好地理解抗血管生成药物治疗监测中的成像技术非常重要。通过组织采样研究肿瘤血管生成依赖于侵入性操作、充分的采样以及对组织学微血管密度的细致评估。人们尝试开发伤口愈合试验,以将伤口中的血管生成与肿瘤中的血管生成相关联,但仍被认为具有侵入性,且健康组织与恶性组织的相关性有效性仍然有限。在各种恶性疾病中检测到了几种肿瘤血管生成的可溶性标志物,并对其作为肿瘤血管生成替代标志物的用途进行了评估。此外,还研究了可溶性标志物,以将其作为成像工具进行可视化。将新的可溶性标志物和成像技术相结合,开发抗癌药物并监测治疗效果,这成为一个动态过程,最终可以很快实现患者的个体反应。可以避免基于解剖学的重新分期程序所带来的耗时延误。本文综述了可溶性生物标志物的特征以及不同的成像技术,如超声、计算机断层扫描(CT)、磁共振成像和正电子发射断层扫描(结合或不结合CT)。