Curtis S W, Shi H, Teng C, Korach K S
Receptor Biology Section, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, USA.
J Mol Endocrinol. 1997 Jun;18(3):203-11. doi: 10.1677/jme.0.0180203.
Certain types of estrogenic compounds have been shown to have tissue-specific actions. In addition, some tissues may exhibit differential gene regulation by agonists and antagonists. Our previous studies using structurally modified estrogenic molecules had indicated differential effects on specific estrogen responses, indicating that the activity of the estrogen receptor protein can be altered depending not only upon the structure of the bound ligand but also the regulated gene itself. The mechanism of differential induction, however, was not determined, and might involve altered binding to the estrogen response element (ERE), altered transcription, or post-transcriptional modification of gene products. Our previous studies indicated that differential induction by modified diethylstilbestrol (DES) agonists could not be accounted for by differences in ligand affinity for the estrogen receptor (ER) or differential binding of the ER to a consensus vitellogenin A2 (vit A2) ERE. To determine if this differential hormonal responsiveness was reflected at the level of transcription, we analyzed mouse uterine mRNA of several estrogen-responsive genes, including glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD), ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) and lactoferrin, by Northern blot following injection with the modified agonists DES, indenestrol A (IA), indenestrol B (IB) and Z-pseudo DES (ZPD). All compounds induced the G6PD message, although IB and ZPD induced expression only transiently, while DES and IA maintained the message for 24 h. No difference in induction was seen for ODC message, which was induced equally by all the compounds. In contrast, lactoferrin, a highly estrogen-responsive gene, was induced only by DES and IA and not by the other agonists IB or ZPD, showing that the lactoferrin gene was differentially regulated by these compounds. To determine whether this difference was due to altered transcriptional activity, the mouse lactoferrin estrogen-responsive module (mERM) linked to a chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT) reporter gene was tested in transfected cells. Using the mouse estrogen receptor in RL95 cells, DES and IA induced expression of CAT, but IB did not, confirming the differential response seen in vivo. To show whether this difference in transcription occurred because of altered binding to the lactoferrin ERE, which is not a perfect consensus ERE a gel shift assay was used to examine DNA binding of ER bound to the agonists. All ligands produced equivalent binding to the lactoferrin ERE suggesting that differential regulation was not a result of altered DNA binding. Taken together, these observations indicate that the differential induction of lactoferrin by these compounds occurs via altered activation of the transcriptional components unique to lactoferrin and is likely to involve altered interaction with co-activators. Surprisingly, unlike the mouse ER, the human estrogen receptor activated and induced expression of lactoferrin estrogen-responsive module-CAT with all the compounds. Mouse ER is also known to vary from the human ER in its activity with the triphenylethylene estrogen tamoxifen, which has agonist activity with the mouse ER but mixed antagonist/agonist activity with the human ER. The data show that human and mouse estrogen receptors are activated differently by this group of stilbestrol estrogen ligands when assayed on the lactoferrin response element, which is the first description of this type of gene and species specific difference. Lactoferrin gene regulation by estrogen receptor can be used as a model to study the mechanism of differential gene activation by different estrogen agonists and antagonists using a more physiological situation than commonly used with in vitro gene reporter systems.
某些类型的雌激素化合物已被证明具有组织特异性作用。此外,一些组织可能对激动剂和拮抗剂表现出不同的基因调控。我们之前使用结构修饰的雌激素分子进行的研究表明,对特定雌激素反应存在差异效应,这表明雌激素受体蛋白的活性不仅可以根据结合配体的结构改变,还可以根据受调控基因本身而改变。然而,差异诱导的机制尚未确定,可能涉及与雌激素反应元件(ERE)的结合改变、转录改变或基因产物的转录后修饰。我们之前的研究表明,修饰的己烯雌酚(DES)激动剂的差异诱导不能用配体对雌激素受体(ER)的亲和力差异或ER与共有卵黄蛋白原A2(vit A2)ERE的差异结合来解释。为了确定这种激素反应性差异是否在转录水平上得到体现,我们在注射修饰激动剂DES、茚雌酚A(IA)、茚雌酚B(IB)和Z-伪DES(ZPD)后,通过Northern印迹分析了几种雌激素反应基因的小鼠子宫mRNA,包括葡萄糖-6-磷酸脱氢酶(G6PD)、鸟氨酸脱羧酶(ODC)和乳铁蛋白。所有化合物均诱导了G6PD信息,尽管IB和ZPD仅短暂诱导表达,而DES和IA维持该信息24小时。ODC信息的诱导没有差异,所有化合物对其诱导程度相同。相比之下,乳铁蛋白是一个高度雌激素反应性基因,仅由DES和IA诱导,而不由其他激动剂IB或ZPD诱导,这表明乳铁蛋白基因受到这些化合物的差异调控。为了确定这种差异是否是由于转录活性改变所致,将与氯霉素乙酰转移酶(CAT)报告基因相连的小鼠乳铁蛋白雌激素反应模块(mERM)在转染细胞中进行了测试。在RL95细胞中使用小鼠雌激素受体,DES和IA诱导了CAT的表达,但IB没有,证实了在体内观察到的差异反应。为了表明这种转录差异是否是由于与乳铁蛋白ERE的结合改变所致(乳铁蛋白ERE不是一个完美的共有ERE),使用凝胶迁移试验检测与激动剂结合的ER与DNA的结合。所有配体与乳铁蛋白ERE的结合相当,表明差异调控不是DNA结合改变的结果。综上所述,这些观察结果表明,这些化合物对乳铁蛋白的差异诱导是通过乳铁蛋白特有的转录成分的激活改变而发生的,并且可能涉及与共激活因子的相互作用改变。令人惊讶的是,与小鼠ER不同,人雌激素受体用所有化合物激活并诱导了乳铁蛋白雌激素反应模块-CAT的表达。已知小鼠ER在与三苯乙烯雌激素他莫昔芬的活性方面也与人ER不同,他莫昔芬对小鼠ER具有激动剂活性,但对人ER具有混合拮抗剂/激动剂活性。数据表明,当在乳铁蛋白反应元件上进行检测时,这组己烯雌酚雌激素配体对人和小鼠雌激素受体的激活方式不同,这是对这种基因和物种特异性差异的首次描述。雌激素受体对乳铁蛋白基因的调控可以作为一个模型,用于研究不同雌激素激动剂和拮抗剂在比常用的体外基因报告系统更具生理学意义的情况下差异激活基因的机制。