Treatment of macroprolactinoma with cabergoline: a study of 85 patients.

OBJECTIVE

Cabergoline is now established as an effective and well-tolerated treatment for prolactinoma. However, there are relatively few published data on the treatment of macro-, as opposed to micro-, prolactinoma. We have therefore reviewed the efficiency and safety of cabergoline in the treatment of patients with prolactin-secreting macroadenomas treated on a compassionate basis.

STUDY DESIGN AND PATIENTS

Eighty-five patients with prolactin-secreting macroadenomas were treated with cabergoline 0.25 to 10.5 mg per week (median 1 mg) given to one to seven doses. Treatment durations ranged between 3 months and 8 years. Sixty-five patients (32 intolerant, 16 resistant) had been treated previously with other dopamine agonists. Pretreatment prolactin levels ranged between 80 and 8300 micrograms/I and tumour maximum diameters were between 11 and 42 mm.

MEASUREMENTS

Serum prolactin, visual fields if initially abnormal, occurrence of menses or return of libido and potency, blood chemistry and adverse events were assessed at 1 month and then at 3-month intervals during treatment. Pituitary computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging was usually repeated at 3 months and 1 year, then yearly, in most patients (n = 62).

RESULTS

Normalization of prolactin levels was achieved in 52 patients (61.2%) and a prolactin decrease of at least 75% of pretreatment values occurred in 24 others (28.2%). Of the 20 de novo patients, 17 had prolactin normalized and the remainder had at least 75% reduction. Disappearance of tumour image was found in eight of 62 evaluable patients (12.9%) and reduction of the largest diameter by at least 25% in another 33 (53.2%), with an overall success rate of 66.1%; among the 17 evaluable de novo patients the success rate was 82.3%. Fifteen of 21 patients who failed to show tumour shrinkage had previously demonstrated resistance/intolerance to other prolactin-lowering treatments. Of the 12 patients with visual field defects at baseline, six normalized and two showed an improvement. Menses resumed during cabergoline treatment in 79.5% of premenopausal women. Restoration of potency was reported by seven of eight evaluable men. Adverse events were recorded in 24.7% of cases, four of whom (4.7%) discontinued treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the present data were not obtained in a formal study we conclude that cabergoline is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for macroprolactinoma patients.