Suppr超能文献

针对患有严重恶性疟原虫疟疾儿童的昏迷量表。

Coma scales for children with severe falciparum malaria.

作者信息

Newton C R, Chokwe T, Schellenberg J A, Winstanley P A, Forster D, Peshu N, Kirkham F J, Marsh K

机构信息

Kenya Medical Research Institute, Clinical Research Centre, Kilifi Unit, Kenya.

出版信息

Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1997 Mar-Apr;91(2):161-5. doi: 10.1016/s0035-9203(97)90207-8.

Abstract

The Blantyre coma scale (BCS) is used to assess children with severe falciparum malaria, particularly as a criterion for cerebral malaria, but it has not been formally validated. We compared the BCS to the Adelaide coma scale (ACS), for Kenyan children with severe malaria. We examined the inter-observer agreement between 3 observers in the assessment of coma scales on 17 children by measuring the proportion of agreement (PA), disagreement rate (DR) and fixed sample size kappa (kappa n). We assessed the sensitivity and specificity of the scales in detecting events (seizures and hypoglycaemia) in 240 children during admission and the usefulness of the scales in predicting outcome. There was considerable disagreement between observers in the assessment of both scales (BCS: PA = 0.55, DR = 0.09 and kappa n = 0.27; ACS: PA = 0.36, DR = 0.31, and kappa n = 0.31), particularly with the verbal component of the BCS (kappa n = 0.02). Compared to the ACS, the BCS was more specific (0.85 for BCS and 0.80 for ACS), but less sensitive (0.25-0.69 vs. 0.38-0.88 respectively) in detecting events and was a worse predictor of neurological sequelae. The BCS provided a better overall assessment of a child's incapacity from falciparum malaria, but the ACS was more useful in assessing neurological disturbances.

摘要

布兰太尔昏迷量表(BCS)用于评估患有严重恶性疟原虫疟疾的儿童,特别是作为脑型疟疾的一项标准,但尚未得到正式验证。我们针对患有严重疟疾的肯尼亚儿童,将BCS与阿德莱德昏迷量表(ACS)进行了比较。我们通过测量一致率(PA)、分歧率(DR)和固定样本量kappa值(kappa n),检验了3名观察者在评估17名儿童昏迷量表时的观察者间一致性。我们评估了这两个量表在240名儿童入院期间检测事件(癫痫发作和低血糖症)的敏感性和特异性,以及量表在预测预后方面的实用性。观察者在评估这两个量表时存在相当大的分歧(BCS:PA = 0.55,DR = 0.09,kappa n = 0.27;ACS:PA = 0.36,DR = 0.31,kappa n = 0.31),特别是在BCS的语言部分(kappa n = 0.02)。与ACS相比,BCS在检测事件方面更具特异性(BCS为0.85,ACS为0.80),但敏感性较低(分别为0.25 - 0.69对0.38 - 0.88),并且在预测神经后遗症方面表现更差。BCS能更好地全面评估儿童因恶性疟原虫疟疾导致的无行为能力情况,但ACS在评估神经功能障碍方面更有用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验