Jevtic V, Watt I, Rozman B, Kos-Golja M, Praprotnik S, Logar D, Presetnik M, Demsar F, Jarh O, Campion G, Musikic P
Radiology Institute, University Medical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1997 Mar-Apr;15(2):151-6.
The aim of this prospective 24-month follow-up study was to compare clinical features with radiological and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in evaluating synovial proliferation in the hand joints of 31 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A single joint was used for the follow-up of each patient.
Thirty-one small hand joints were examined by conventional radiography and MRI before and after 24 months of treatment. MRI assessment of disease progression (volume and/or signal intensity of the synovial proliferation on T1 weighted precontrast, T1 weighted postcontrast and T2 weighted images) was compared with a clinical assessment of the chosen joints, and with a plain x-ray film evaluation (Larsen's score).
Of 26 joints which clinically improved (14 markedly and 14 slightly) during the study, on MRI 16 showed improvement, 8 showed no change, and 2 showed deterioration. Four clinically unchanged joints appeared improved on MRI. One joint deteriorated clinically and on MRI. Overall, there was a 58% congruence between clinical and MRI findings. On x-ray 23 joints showed no change; nine of these were also unchanged on MRI, while 13 showed improvement and one deterioration. Only in 2 out of 8 joints showing deterioration on x-ray were the MRI findings in accordance. In the remaining six joints MRI showed improvement. The congruence between x-ray and MRI was therefore 36%.
The long-term follow-up of rheumatoid synovial proliferation of the small joints in the hand using contrast enhanced MRI is feasible and may provide additional information regarding disease activity. Important advantages over conventional radiography methods are its ability to demonstrate qualitative differences of synovial proliferation within bone erosions, and demonstrate not only deterioration, but also the improvement of inflammatory disease.
这项为期24个月的前瞻性随访研究旨在比较31例类风湿关节炎(RA)患者手部关节滑膜增生的临床特征与放射学及磁共振成像(MRI)表现。每位患者选取一个单关节进行随访。
在治疗24个月前后,对31个手部小关节进行常规放射摄影和MRI检查。将MRI对疾病进展的评估(T1加权增强前、T1加权增强后及T2加权图像上滑膜增生的体积和/或信号强度)与所选关节的临床评估以及X线平片评估(Larsen评分)进行比较。
在研究期间临床改善的26个关节中(14个显著改善,14个轻度改善),MRI显示16个关节有改善,8个关节无变化,2个关节恶化。4个临床无变化的关节在MRI上显示有改善。1个关节临床和MRI均恶化。总体而言,临床和MRI表现的一致性为58%。X线检查显示23个关节无变化;其中9个关节在MRI上也无变化,13个关节显示改善,1个关节恶化。在X线显示恶化的8个关节中,只有2个关节的MRI表现与之相符。其余6个关节MRI显示有改善。因此,X线和MRI的一致性为36%。
使用对比增强MRI对手部小关节类风湿滑膜增生进行长期随访是可行的,并且可能提供有关疾病活动的额外信息。与传统放射学方法相比,其重要优势在于能够显示骨侵蚀内滑膜增生的定性差异,不仅能显示疾病恶化,还能显示炎症性疾病的改善。