Fort P, Farmer C, Westerman J, Johannigman J, Beninati W, Dolan S, Derdak S
Department of Pulmonary/Critical Care Medieine, Wilford Hall Medical Center, Lackland AFB, San Antonio, TX 78236-5300, USA.
Crit Care Med. 1997 Jun;25(6):937-47. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199706000-00008.
To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation using a protocol designed to recruit and maintain optimal lung volume in patients with severe adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
Surgical and medical intensive care units in a tertiary care, military teaching hospital.
A prospective, clinical study.
Seventeen patients, 17 yrs to 83 yrs of age, with severe ARDS (Lung Injury Score of 3.81 +/- 0.23) failing inverse ratio mechanical conventional ventilation (PaO2/FiO2 ratio of 68.6 +/- 21.6, peak inspiratory pressure of 54.3 +/- 12.7 cm H2O, positive end-expiratory pressure of 18.2 +/- 6.9 cm H2O).
High-frequency oscillatory ventilation was instituted after varying periods of conventional ventilation (5.12 +/- 4.3 days). We employed lung volume recruitment strategy that consisted of incremental increases in mean airway pressure to achieve a PaO2 of > or = 60 torr (> or = 8.0 kPa), with an FiO2 of < or = 0.6.
High-frequency oscillator ventilator settings (FiO2, mean airway pressure, pressure amplitude of oscillation [delta P] frequency) and hemodynamic parameters (cardiac output, oxygen delivery [DO2]), mean systemic and pulmonary arterial pressures, and the oxygenation index (oxygenation index = [FiO2 x mean airway pressure x 100]/PaO2) were monitored during the transition to high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and throughout the course of the high-frequency protocol. Thirteen patients demonstrated improved gas exchange and an overall improvement in PaO2/FiO2 ratio (p < .02). Reductions in the oxygenation index (p < .01) and FiO2 (p < .02) at 12, 24, and 48 hrs after starting high-frequency oscillatory ventilation were observed. No significant compromise in cardiac output or DO2 was observed, despite a significant increase in mean airway pressure (31.2 +/- 10.3 to 34.0 +/- 6.7 cm H2O, p < .05) on high-frequency oscillatory ventilation. The overall survival rate at 30 days was 47%. A greater number of pretreatment days on conventional ventilation (p < .009) and an entry oxygenation index of > 47 (sensitivity 100%, specificity 100%) were associated with mortality.
High-frequency oscillatory ventilation is both safe and effective in adult patients with severe ARDS failing conventional ventilation. A lung volume recruitment strategy during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation produced improved gas exchange without a compromise in DO2. These results are encouraging and support the need for a prospective, randomized trial of algorithm-controlled conventional ventilation vs. high-frequency oscillatory ventilation for adults with severe ARDS.
采用旨在使重症成人呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者募集并维持最佳肺容积的方案,评估高频振荡通气的安全性和有效性。
一家三级护理军事教学医院的外科和内科重症监护病房。
一项前瞻性临床研究。
17例年龄在17岁至83岁之间的重症ARDS患者(肺损伤评分为3.81±0.23),其反比机械常规通气失败(动脉血氧分压/吸入氧分数值为68.6±21.6,吸气峰压为54.3±12.7 cmH₂O,呼气末正压为18.2±6.9 cmH₂O)。
在不同时长的常规通气(5.12±4.3天)后开始高频振荡通气。我们采用了肺容积募集策略,包括逐步增加平均气道压以达到动脉血氧分压≥60托(≥8.0 kPa),吸入氧分数≤0.6。
在转换为高频振荡通气的过程中以及整个高频方案实施过程中,监测高频振荡通气机设置(吸入氧分数、平均气道压、振荡压力幅度[ΔP]、频率)和血流动力学参数(心输出量、氧输送[DO₂])、平均体循环和肺动脉压以及氧合指数(氧合指数 = [吸入氧分数×平均气道压×100]/动脉血氧分压)。13例患者气体交换得到改善,动脉血氧分压/吸入氧分数值总体改善(p < 0.02)。在开始高频振荡通气后12、24和48小时,观察到氧合指数(p < 0.01)和吸入氧分数(p < 0.02)降低。尽管高频振荡通气时平均气道压显著升高(从31.2±10.3升至34.0±6.7 cmH₂O,p < 0.05),但未观察到心输出量或氧输送有显著损害。30天总体生存率为47%。常规通气的预处理天数较多(p < 0.009)以及入院时氧合指数>47(敏感性100%,特异性100%)与死亡率相关。
高频振荡通气对于常规通气失败的重症成人ARDS患者既安全又有效。高频振荡通气期间的肺容积募集策略可改善气体交换,且不损害氧输送。这些结果令人鼓舞,并支持对重症成人ARDS患者进行算法控制的常规通气与高频振荡通气的前瞻性随机试验。