Suppr超能文献

[鼻部激发试验在过敏患者中的价值。对多种变应原诱发的皮肤吸入试验和肺部试验相关性的比较研究]

[Value of the nose provocation test in the allergic patient. A comparative study of the correlation skin inhalation, and lung tests provoked with various allergens].

作者信息

Clement P A, Van Dishoeck E A, Stoop A P, Hoek G T, Van de Wal R J, Van Strik R

出版信息

Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg. 1977;31(2):129-51.

PMID:920148
Abstract

The authors make a comparative study in 55 CNLSD children and 10 healthy children. In all those children, provocation tests were performed as wel at the level of the skin, as at the level of the lung and nose. The provocation tests were performed with the following allergens: house dust, mites, human dander and pollen, and with histamine. Only in the control group (10 healthy children) no lung provocations with histamine were done. From the investigation follows that skin tests are not always reliable. Furthermore, in many cases a nose provocation test (combination of aerosole. Furthermore, in many cases a nose provocation test (combination of aerosol provocation with a allergen and PAR rhinomanometry) can replace a lung provocation test.

摘要

作者对55名慢性非特异性肺疾病(CNLSD)儿童和10名健康儿童进行了一项比较研究。在所有这些儿童中,在皮肤、肺部和鼻子水平都进行了激发试验。激发试验使用了以下过敏原:屋尘、螨虫、人皮屑和花粉,以及组胺。仅在对照组(10名健康儿童)中未进行组胺肺部激发试验。从调查结果来看,皮肤试验并不总是可靠的。此外,在许多情况下,鼻激发试验(气雾剂激发与过敏原和鼻阻力测量法相结合)可以替代肺激发试验。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验