• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[鼻部激发试验在过敏患者中的价值。对多种变应原诱发的皮肤吸入试验和肺部试验相关性的比较研究]

[Value of the nose provocation test in the allergic patient. A comparative study of the correlation skin inhalation, and lung tests provoked with various allergens].

作者信息

Clement P A, Van Dishoeck E A, Stoop A P, Hoek G T, Van de Wal R J, Van Strik R

出版信息

Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg. 1977;31(2):129-51.

PMID:920148
Abstract

The authors make a comparative study in 55 CNLSD children and 10 healthy children. In all those children, provocation tests were performed as wel at the level of the skin, as at the level of the lung and nose. The provocation tests were performed with the following allergens: house dust, mites, human dander and pollen, and with histamine. Only in the control group (10 healthy children) no lung provocations with histamine were done. From the investigation follows that skin tests are not always reliable. Furthermore, in many cases a nose provocation test (combination of aerosole. Furthermore, in many cases a nose provocation test (combination of aerosol provocation with a allergen and PAR rhinomanometry) can replace a lung provocation test.

摘要

作者对55名慢性非特异性肺疾病(CNLSD)儿童和10名健康儿童进行了一项比较研究。在所有这些儿童中,在皮肤、肺部和鼻子水平都进行了激发试验。激发试验使用了以下过敏原:屋尘、螨虫、人皮屑和花粉,以及组胺。仅在对照组(10名健康儿童)中未进行组胺肺部激发试验。从调查结果来看,皮肤试验并不总是可靠的。此外,在许多情况下,鼻激发试验(气雾剂激发与过敏原和鼻阻力测量法相结合)可以替代肺激发试验。

相似文献

1
[Value of the nose provocation test in the allergic patient. A comparative study of the correlation skin inhalation, and lung tests provoked with various allergens].[鼻部激发试验在过敏患者中的价值。对多种变应原诱发的皮肤吸入试验和肺部试验相关性的比较研究]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg. 1977;31(2):129-51.
2
[Value of clinical history, skin testing and nasal allergen challenge in the diagnose of perennial rhinopathia].[临床病史、皮肤试验及鼻过敏原激发试验在常年性鼻病诊断中的价值]
Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg). 1976 Jun;55(6):482-6.
3
[Hypersensitivity to cockroach allergen among children with bronchial asthma living in the Łódź district].[罗兹地区支气管哮喘患儿对蟑螂过敏原的超敏反应]
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2000 Oct;9(52):657-61.
4
[Skin tests, RAST and provocation tests with a purified acarian extract (Pharmalgen) in respiratory hypersensitivity].[皮肤试验、放射变应原吸附试验以及使用纯化螨提取物(Pharmalgen)进行的激发试验在呼吸道超敏反应中的应用]
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1984 Dec 1;114(48):1769-70.
5
The nose provocation and the passive anterior rhinometry (PAR).鼻激发试验和被动前鼻测压法(PAR)。
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg. 1978;32(1):56-63.
6
Histamine release test in comparison to standard tests in diagnosis of childhood allergic asthma.组胺释放试验与标准试验在儿童过敏性哮喘诊断中的比较
Ann Allergy. 1990 Jul;65(1):46-51.
7
House dust mite and cockroach exposure are strong risk factors for positive allergy skin test responses in the Childhood Asthma Management Program.在儿童哮喘管理项目中,接触屋尘螨和蟑螂是皮肤过敏试验呈阳性反应的强烈风险因素。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001 Jan;107(1):48-54. doi: 10.1067/mai.2001.111146.
8
[Conjunctival provocation test with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus in the diagnosis of allergic conjunctivitis from house mites].[用屋尘螨变应原提取物进行结膜激发试验诊断屋尘螨过敏性结膜炎]
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2001 Jun;24(6):581-9.
9
Phazet skin prick tests versus conventional prick tests with allergens and histamine in children.儿童中使用Phazet皮肤点刺试验与传统过敏原和组胺点刺试验的比较。
Ann Allergy. 1990 Feb;64(2 Pt 1):166-9.
10
[Prevalence of the most common respiratory allergens generating positive prick-reaction based on the examination of 2124 children suffering from respiratory allergy, between 1992-2000].[基于对1992年至2000年间2124名患有呼吸道过敏的儿童进行检查,产生阳性点刺反应的最常见呼吸道过敏原的患病率]
Orv Hetil. 2005 May 1;146(18):833-7.