Dantendorfer K, Amering M, Bankier A, Helbich T, Prayer D, Youssefzadeh S, Alexandrowicz R, Imhof H, Katschnig H
Department of Psychiatry, University of Vienna, Austria.
Magn Reson Imaging. 1997;15(3):301-6. doi: 10.1016/s0730-725x(96)00385-2.
We investigated to see if motion artifacts (MA) occurring in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are related to prescan anxiety measures and test the feasibility of identifying patients at risk for the development of MA before scanning. Furthermore, to determine a possible influence of constructional differences between a 1.5 and a 0.5 tesla scanner on the frequency of MA. Two hundred and ninety-seven first time MRI patients were surveyed before and after imaging with anxiety and attitude questionnaires. Frequency and impact on diagnostic quality of MA were documented. 12.8% of all scans showed MA not related to normal body pulsations. In 6.4% the diagnostic quality was impaired. Constructional differences did not influence the frequency of MA. Also, anxiety as determined with the most common anxiety measuring instrument was not related to the development of MA. Concern about the technical apparatus identified 70.6% of all individuals developing MA. Patients at risk for the development of MA can be identified prior to scanning. It seems necessary to further develop reliable methods to detect them and to evaluate strategies to prevent MA.
我们进行了调查,以查看磁共振成像(MRI)中出现的运动伪影(MA)是否与扫描前焦虑测量指标相关,并测试在扫描前识别有发生MA风险患者的可行性。此外,确定1.5特斯拉和0.5特斯拉扫描仪之间结构差异对MA频率的可能影响。对297名首次进行MRI检查的患者在成像前后进行了焦虑和态度问卷调查。记录了MA的频率及其对诊断质量的影响。所有扫描中有12.8%显示出与正常身体搏动无关的MA。在6.4%的扫描中,诊断质量受到损害。结构差异并未影响MA的频率。同样,使用最常用的焦虑测量工具所确定的焦虑与MA的发生无关。对技术设备的担忧可识别出所有发生MA的个体中的70.6%。有发生MA风险的患者在扫描前即可被识别。似乎有必要进一步开发可靠的方法来检测他们,并评估预防MA的策略。