Callahan H S, Pigliucci M, Schlichting C D
Department of Botany, University of Tennessee, Knoxville 37996, USA.
Bioessays. 1997 Jun;19(6):519-25. doi: 10.1002/bies.950190611.
The plastic response of phenotypic traits to environmental change is a common research focus in several disciplines-from ecology and evolutionary biology to physiology and molecular genetics. The use of model systems such as the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana has facilitated a dialogue between developmental biologists asking how plasticity is controlled (proximate causes) and organismal biologists asking why plasticity exists (ultimate causes). Researchers studying ultimate causes and consequences are increasingly compelled to reject simplistic, 'black box' models, while those studying proximate causes and mechanisms are increasingly obliged to subject their interpretations to ecological 'reality checks.' We review the successful multidisciplinary efforts to understand the phytochrome-mediated shade-avoidance and light-seeking responses of flowering plants as a pertinent example of convergence between evolutionary and molecular biology. In this example, the two-way exchange between reductionist and holist camps has been essential to rapid and sustained progress. This should serve as a model for future collaborative efforts towards understanding the responses of organisms to their constantly changing environments.
表型性状对环境变化的可塑性反应是从生态学、进化生物学到生理学和分子遗传学等多个学科的共同研究重点。诸如开花植物拟南芥等模型系统的使用促进了发育生物学家(探究可塑性如何被控制,即近端原因)和有机体生物学家(探究可塑性为何存在,即终极原因)之间的对话。研究终极原因和后果的研究人员越来越被迫摒弃简单化的“黑箱”模型,而研究近端原因和机制的研究人员则越来越有必要使其解释接受生态学的“现实检验”。我们回顾了成功的多学科研究成果,这些研究旨在理解开花植物中由光敏色素介导的避荫和向光反应,以此作为进化生物学和分子生物学融合的一个相关实例。在这个例子中,还原论阵营和整体论阵营之间的双向交流对于快速且持续的进展至关重要。这应该成为未来协同努力理解生物体对其不断变化的环境所做出反应的一个典范。