• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用神经网络进行冠状动脉搭桥风险预测。

Coronary artery bypass risk prediction using neural networks.

作者信息

Lippmann R P, Shahian D M

机构信息

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Lahey Hitchcock Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts 01805, USA.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 1997 Jun;63(6):1635-43. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(97)00225-7.

DOI:10.1016/s0003-4975(97)00225-7
PMID:9205161
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Neural networks are nonparametric, robust, pattern recognition techniques that can be used to model complex relationships.

METHODS

The applicability of multilayer perceptron neural networks (MLP) to coronary artery bypass grafting risk prediction was assessed using The Society of Thoracic Surgeons database of 80,606 patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting in 1993. The results of traditional logistic regression and Bayesian analysis were compared with single-layer (no hidden layer), two-layer (one hidden layer), and three-layer (two hidden layer) MLP neural networks. These networks were trained using stochastic gradient descent with early stopping. All prediction models used the same variables and were evaluated by training on 40,480 patients and cross-validation testing on a separate group of 40,126 patients. Techniques were also developed to calculate effective odds ratios for MLP networks and to generate confidence intervals for MLP risk predictions using an auxiliary "confidence MLP."

RESULTS

Receiver operating characteristic curve areas for predicting mortality were approximately 76% for all classifiers, including neural networks. Calibration (accuracy of posterior probability prediction) was slightly better with a two-member committee classifier that averaged the outputs of a MLP network and a logistic regression model. Unlike the individual methods, the committee classifier did not overestimate or underestimate risk for high-risk patients.

CONCLUSIONS

A committee classifier combining the best neural network and logistic regression provided the best model calibration, but the receiver operating characteristic curve area was only 76% irrespective of which predictive model was used.

摘要

背景

神经网络是一种非参数、稳健的模式识别技术,可用于对复杂关系进行建模。

方法

利用胸外科医师协会1993年80606例接受冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的数据库,评估多层感知器神经网络(MLP)在冠状动脉旁路移植术风险预测中的适用性。将传统逻辑回归和贝叶斯分析的结果与单层(无隐藏层)、两层(一个隐藏层)和三层(两个隐藏层)MLP神经网络进行比较。这些网络采用随机梯度下降法并结合早期停止进行训练。所有预测模型使用相同的变量,并通过对40480例患者进行训练以及对另外40126例患者进行交叉验证测试来评估。还开发了一些技术来计算MLP网络的有效比值比,并使用辅助“置信MLP”为MLP风险预测生成置信区间。

结果

包括神经网络在内的所有分类器预测死亡率的受试者工作特征曲线面积约为76%。使用一个由MLP网络和逻辑回归模型输出平均得到的双成员委员会分类器时,校准(后验概率预测的准确性)略好。与单个方法不同,委员会分类器不会高估或低估高危患者的风险。

结论

结合最佳神经网络和逻辑回归的委员会分类器提供了最佳的模型校准,但无论使用哪种预测模型,受试者工作特征曲线面积仅为76%。

相似文献

1
Coronary artery bypass risk prediction using neural networks.使用神经网络进行冠状动脉搭桥风险预测。
Ann Thorac Surg. 1997 Jun;63(6):1635-43. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(97)00225-7.
2
Risk factor identification and mortality prediction in cardiac surgery using artificial neural networks.使用人工神经网络进行心脏手术中的危险因素识别和死亡率预测。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Jul;132(1):12-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.12.055.
3
Predicting mortality after coronary artery bypass surgery: what do artificial neural networks learn? The Steering Committee of the Cardiac Care Network of Ontario.预测冠状动脉搭桥手术后的死亡率:人工神经网络学到了什么?安大略省心脏护理网络指导委员会。
Med Decis Making. 1998 Apr-Jun;18(2):229-35. doi: 10.1177/0272989x9801800212.
4
Calculating risk and outcome: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons database.计算风险与结果:胸外科医师协会数据库
Ann Thorac Surg. 1996 Nov;62(5 Suppl):S2-5; discussion S31-2. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(96)00818-1.
5
Novel maximum-margin training algorithms for supervised neural networks.用于监督神经网络的新型最大间隔训练算法。
IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 2010 Jun;21(6):972-84. doi: 10.1109/TNN.2010.2046423. Epub 2010 Apr 19.
6
An Australian risk prediction model for 30-day mortality after isolated coronary artery bypass: the AusSCORE.一种用于孤立性冠状动脉搭桥术后30天死亡率的澳大利亚风险预测模型:澳大利亚心脏外科手术风险评分(AusSCORE)
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Oct;138(4):904-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.03.020. Epub 2009 May 31.
7
Neural network modeling for surgical decisions on traumatic brain injury patients.用于创伤性脑损伤患者手术决策的神经网络建模
Int J Med Inform. 2000 Jan;57(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/s1386-5056(99)00054-4.
8
AusSCORE II in predicting 30-day mortality after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting in Australia and New Zealand.澳大利亚和新西兰地区使用澳式心脏外科手术风险评分系统(AusSCORE II)预测单纯冠状动脉搭桥术后30天死亡率。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Nov;148(5):1850-1855.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.02.027. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
9
Artificial neural network versus multiple logistic function to predict 25-year coronary heart disease mortality in the Seven Countries Study.人工神经网络与多重逻辑函数预测七国研究中25年冠心病死亡率的比较
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2009 Oct;16(5):583-91. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e32832d49e1.
10
First report on 30-day and operative mortality in risk model of isolated coronary artery bypass grafting in Japan.日本单纯冠状动脉搭桥术风险模型中30天和手术死亡率的首次报告。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Dec;86(6):1866-72. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.08.001.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial intelligence in cardiovascular procedures: a bibliometric and visual analysis study.心血管手术中的人工智能:一项文献计量与可视化分析研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Feb 28;87(4):2187-2203. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003112. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Integrating Machine Learning into Statistical Methods in Disease Risk Prediction Modeling: A Systematic Review.将机器学习整合到疾病风险预测模型的统计方法中:一项系统综述。
Health Data Sci. 2024 Jul 23;4:0165. doi: 10.34133/hds.0165. eCollection 2024.
3
A machine learning model for prediction of 30-day primary graft failure after heart transplantation.
一种用于预测心脏移植后30天原发性移植物功能衰竭的机器学习模型。
Heliyon. 2023 Mar 5;9(3):e14282. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14282. eCollection 2023 Mar.
4
Neural Networks for Survival Prediction in Medicine Using Prognostic Factors: A Review and Critical Appraisal.神经网络在医学预后因素预测中的应用:综述与评价。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Sep 30;2022:1176060. doi: 10.1155/2022/1176060. eCollection 2022.
5
Machine learning methods for perioperative anesthetic management in cardiac surgery patients: a scoping review.心脏手术患者围手术期麻醉管理的机器学习方法:一项范围综述
J Thorac Dis. 2021 Dec;13(12):6976-6993. doi: 10.21037/jtd-21-765.
6
Machine Learning to Predict Outcomes and Cost by Phase of Care After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.机器学习预测冠状动脉旁路移植术后各阶段的预后和成本。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2022 Sep;114(3):711-719. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.08.040. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
7
Commentary: Dabblers: Beware of hidden dangers in machine-learning comparisons.述评:浅尝辄止者需警惕——机器学习比较中的潜在危险
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Jun;163(6):2088-2090. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.08.091. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
8
Artificial neural network models to predict nodal status in clinically node-negative breast cancer.人工神经网络模型预测临床淋巴结阴性乳腺癌的淋巴结状态。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Jun 21;19(1):610. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5827-6.
9
Can Big Data Fulfill Its Promise?大数据能兑现其承诺吗?
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016 Nov;9(6):679-682. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003097. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
10
Predicting reintubation, prolonged mechanical ventilation and death in post-coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a comparison between artificial neural networks and logistic regression models.预测冠状动脉搭桥术后再插管、机械通气延长及死亡情况:人工神经网络与逻辑回归模型的比较
Arch Med Sci. 2015 Aug 12;11(4):756-63. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2015.48145. Epub 2015 Aug 11.