Groten M, Pröbster L
Department of Prosthodontics, University of Tübingen Dental Clinic, Germany.
Int J Prosthodont. 1997 Mar-Apr;10(2):169-77.
One hundred twenty pressed feldspathic ceramic crowns were luted to 20 steel dies using six different cementation modes. Fracture resistance was tested under an angle of 45 degrees and was determined as the maximal fracture load. Crowns were tested with luting agent only (groups A and C) and after etching with hydrofluoric acid, silanating, and the application of a bonding agent (groups B, D, E, and F). The resulting means were: phosphate cement 294.3 (A) and 282.2 (B); glass-ionomer cement 217.2 (C) and 255.4 (D); resin composite 382.2 (E) and 687.6 (F). Statistical analysis revealed significantly greater fracture resistance (P < .01) of resin luted crowns. Bonding to the die almost doubled the fracture resistance. Conditioning of the inner surfaces of the crowns did not improve the fracture resistance of crowns luted using zinc phosphate or glass-ionomer cements.
使用六种不同的粘结方式将120个压制的长石质陶瓷冠粘结到20个钢模上。在45度角下测试抗断裂性,并将其确定为最大断裂载荷。仅使用粘结剂对冠进行测试(A组和C组),以及在使用氢氟酸蚀刻、硅烷化并施加粘结剂之后对冠进行测试(B组、D组、E组和F组)。得到的平均值为:磷酸锌水门汀294.3(A组)和282.2(B组);玻璃离子水门汀217.2(C组)和255.4(D组);树脂复合材料382.2(E组)和687.6(F组)。统计分析显示,树脂粘结冠的抗断裂性显著更高(P < 0.01)。与模具粘结几乎使抗断裂性提高了一倍。对冠的内表面进行处理并没有提高使用磷酸锌或玻璃离子水门汀粘结的冠的抗断裂性。