• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

常规手术胆管造影:批判性评估。

Routine operative cholangiography: a critical appraisal.

作者信息

Seif R M

出版信息

Am J Surg. 1977 Nov;134(5):566-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(77)90435-4.

DOI:10.1016/0002-9610(77)90435-4
PMID:920882
Abstract

If abnormal liver function tests are added to the classic criteria for expectancy of common bile duct stone, the rate of unexpected common bile duct stone findings should be 1 percent or less. This low rate does not justify the cost of routine operative cholangiography. However, a preexploratory operative cholangiogram should be performed prior to common bile duct exploration in order to avoid negative, and therefore unnecessary, common bile duct explorations.

摘要

如果将肝功能检查异常纳入胆总管结石预期的经典标准中,意外发现胆总管结石的发生率应在1%或更低。如此低的发生率并不能证明常规术中胆管造影的成本是合理的。然而,在进行胆总管探查之前应先行探查性术中胆管造影,以避免进行阴性的、因此也是不必要的胆总管探查。

相似文献

1
Routine operative cholangiography: a critical appraisal.常规手术胆管造影:批判性评估。
Am J Surg. 1977 Nov;134(5):566-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(77)90435-4.
2
Management of suspected common bile duct stones on cholangiogram during same-stay cholecystectomy for acute gallstone-related disease.在因急性胆结石相关疾病同期行胆囊切除术时,经胆管造影对疑似胆总管结石的处理
BMC Surg. 2017 Apr 17;17(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12893-017-0232-z.
3
Clinical efficacy and safety of selective trans-cystic intra-operative cholangiography in primary suture following three-port laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.三孔腹腔镜胆总管探查一期缝合术中选择性经胆囊管术中胆道造影的临床疗效及安全性。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2012 Oct;125(19):3509-13.
4
Operative cholangiography. Its effect on the practice of cholecystectomy.术中胆管造影。其对胆囊切除术实践的影响。
Br Med J. 1970 Oct 17;4(5728):161-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.4.5728.161.
5
An evaluation of routine operative cholangiography.常规手术胆管造影评估。
Aust N Z J Surg. 1988 May;58(5):391-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1988.tb01086.x.
6
A five years review intra-operative cholangiogram.一项关于术中胆管造影的五年回顾。
J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2011 Apr;9(1):52-5.
7
A prospective single-blinded controlled study comparing laparoscopic ultrasound of the common bile duct with operative cholangiography.一项比较胆总管腹腔镜超声与手术胆管造影的前瞻性单盲对照研究。
Surg Endosc. 2003 Feb;17(2):216-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8911-x. Epub 2002 Dec 4.
8
The major role of the operative cholangiogram within the indications for common bile duct exploration.术中胆管造影在胆总管探查指征中的主要作用。
Am Surg. 1984 Oct;50(10):530-3.
9
Routine or indicated operative cholangiography?常规或必要的术中胆管造影?
Aust N Z J Surg. 1980 Oct;50(5):481-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1980.tb04174.x.
10
Post-exploratory operative cholangiography: is it a useful technique to check clearance of the common bile duct?探索性手术后胆管造影:它是检查胆总管通畅情况的有用技术吗?
Clin Radiol. 1982 Sep;33(5):535-8. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(82)80171-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Post-cholecystectomy symptoms after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术后的胆囊切除术后症状
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1993 Sep;75(5):349-53.
2
Selective or routine intraoperative cholangiography: a cost-effectiveness analysis.选择性或常规术中胆管造影:一项成本效益分析。
World J Surg. 1980 May;4(3):315-22. doi: 10.1007/BF02393390.
3
Predictive ability of choledocholithiasis indicators. A prospective evaluation.胆总管结石指标的预测能力。一项前瞻性评估。
Ann Surg. 1985 Jul;202(1):64-8. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198507000-00010.
4
Consequences of routine peroperative cholangiography during cholecystectomy for gallstone disease: a prospective, randomized study.
World J Surg. 1986 Dec;10(6):996-1002. doi: 10.1007/BF01658656.
5
Comparison of operative ultrasonography and radiography in screening of the common bile duct for calculi.
World J Surg. 1987 Oct;11(5):628-34. doi: 10.1007/BF01655839.
6
Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy: results of the technique in 210 patients.腹腔镜激光胆囊切除术:210例患者的手术结果
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1992 Jul;74(4):237-41.