Svensson P, Bläsing O E, Westhoff P
Department of Biochemistry, Stockholm University, Sweden.
Eur J Biochem. 1997 Jun 1;246(2):452-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1997.t01-1-00452.x.
C4 phosphoenolpyruvate (P-pyruvate) carboxylases have evolved from ancestral C3 P-pyruvate carboxylases during the evolution of C4 photosynthesis (Lepiniec et al., 1994). To meet the requirements of a new metabolic pathway, the C4 enzymes have gained distinct kinetic and regulatory properties compared to C3 enzymes. Our interest is to deduce the structure responsible for these C4-specific properties. As a model system, the orthologous ppcA P-pyruvate carboxylases of Flaveria trinervia (C4) and Flaveria pringlei (C3) were investigated by expressing them in Escherichia coli using their cDNAs. The K(m) (P-pyruvate) was about ten times higher for the C4 enzyme (650 microM) than for the C3 enzyme (60 microM). The activation by glucose 6-phosphate, which was shown by a decrease in the K(m) (P-pyruvate), was about twice for the C4 enzyme and three times for the C3 enzyme. The C3 enzyme showed a very high sensitivity to L-malate with an I(0.5) (50% inhibition) value of 80 microM malate, whereas the C4 enzyme was much less sensitive with a I(0.5) value of 1.2 mM malate. To locate the structural positions responsible for these differences in kinetic and regulatory properties, chimeras of these 95% identical enzymes were made. In this study, the first 437 residues of the 966-amino-acid protein were interchanged. The results showed that the N-terminal part of the enzyme was responsible for a small but significant part of the kinetic difference observed between these two isoenzymes. Additionally, the results suggest that the N-terminus was the site for glucose 6-phosphate activation and was also responsible for the observed difference in activation by this sugar phosphate. The difference in inhibition by L-malate, however, is suggested to originate mainly from the C-terminal part of the enzyme.
在C4光合作用的进化过程中,C4磷酸烯醇丙酮酸(P-丙酮酸)羧化酶是从祖先C3 P-丙酮酸羧化酶进化而来的(勒皮涅克等人,1994年)。为了满足新代谢途径的需求,与C3酶相比,C4酶具有独特的动力学和调节特性。我们感兴趣的是推断出赋予这些C4特异性特性的结构。作为一个模型系统,通过使用它们的cDNA在大肠杆菌中表达,对三角叶黄鹌菜(C4)和普氏黄鹌菜(C3)的直系同源ppcA P-丙酮酸羧化酶进行了研究。C4酶的K(m)(P-丙酮酸)(650微摩尔)比C3酶(60微摩尔)高约10倍。6-磷酸葡萄糖的激活作用表现为K(m)(P-丙酮酸)降低,C4酶的激活作用约为C3酶的两倍,而C3酶的激活作用约为C4酶的三倍。C3酶对L-苹果酸非常敏感,I(0.5)(50%抑制)值为80微摩尔苹果酸,而C4酶对苹果酸的敏感性要低得多,I(0.5)值为1.2毫摩尔苹果酸。为了定位导致这些动力学和调节特性差异的结构位置,构建了这些95%相同的酶的嵌合体。在这项研究中,对966个氨基酸的蛋白质的前437个残基进行了互换。结果表明,该酶的N端部分对这两种同工酶之间观察到的动力学差异有一小部分但显著的影响。此外,结果表明N端是6-磷酸葡萄糖激活的位点,也是观察到的该磷酸糖激活差异的原因。然而,L-苹果酸抑制作用的差异主要源于该酶的C端部分。