Olesen M, Gudmand-Høyer E
Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology F, Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Am J Clin Nutr. 1997 Jul;66(1):62-6. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/66.1.62.
A fraction of wheat bread is malabsorbed in healthy humans. The malabsorbed fraction is bigger than what can be accounted for by in vitro measurements of dietary fibers and resistant starch. To determine whether it is a specific fraction defined by the structure of the starch molecule or a variable amount--which depends on the individual, the amount ingested, and other components of the meal--we performed a dose-response study on wheat bread in healthy human volunteers. Malabsorption was evaluated by using the breath-hydrogen test. Test meals were as follows: 20 g wheat bran mixed in 100 mL water; bread made from 25, 75, 100, 150, and 200 g white wheat flour (WWF); bread made from 0 g WWF and 20 g wheat bran; and bread made from 100 g WWF served with 11 or 26 g butter, corresponding to 20% or 35% of energy from fat in the meals. Three of seven volunteers malabsorbed a fraction of the bread made from 25 g WWF and five of seven a fraction of the bread made from 75 g WWF. All volunteers malabsorbed a fraction of the 100-g WWF bread, Bread made from 180 g WWF and 20 g wheat bran resulted in a breath-hydrogen response of the same magnitude as that from bread made from 200 g WWF alone. The 100-g WWF bread + 11 g butter resulted in a significantly higher breath-hydrogen response than did the bread alone, whereas the 100-g WWF bread + 26 g butter resulted in an average response of the same magnitude as that from bread alone. We conclude that the malabsorbed fraction of wheat bread was dependent on the amount ingested, the composition of the meal, and individual gastrointestinal handling. Fermentation of wheat bran resulted in a very low breath-hydrogen response compared with lactulose or wheat bread. Addition of 11 g butter to the bread seemed to increase the malabsorbed fraction of the starch, an effect that was abolished when the amount of butter was increased to 26 g.
在健康人群中,有一部分小麦面包会出现吸收不良的情况。吸收不良的部分比通过膳食纤维和抗性淀粉的体外测量所能解释的要大。为了确定这是由淀粉分子结构定义的特定部分,还是取决于个体、摄入量以及餐食中其他成分的可变数量,我们对健康志愿者进行了关于小麦面包的剂量反应研究。通过呼气氢试验评估吸收不良情况。试验餐如下:20克麦麸混入100毫升水中;由25克、75克、100克、150克和200克白小麦粉(WWF)制成的面包;由0克WWF和20克麦麸制成的面包;以及由100克WWF搭配11克或26克黄油制成的面包,分别对应餐食中20%或35%的脂肪能量。7名志愿者中有3名对由25克WWF制成的面包出现了部分吸收不良,7名中有5名对由75克WWF制成的面包出现了部分吸收不良。所有志愿者对100克WWF面包都出现了部分吸收不良。由180克WWF和20克麦麸制成的面包产生的呼气氢反应与仅由200克WWF制成的面包相同。100克WWF面包 + 11克黄油产生的呼气氢反应明显高于单独的面包,而100克WWF面包 + 26克黄油产生的反应与单独面包的平均反应相同。我们得出结论,小麦面包吸收不良的部分取决于摄入量、餐食组成以及个体的胃肠道处理情况。与乳果糖或小麦面包相比,麦麸发酵产生的呼气氢反应非常低。在面包中添加11克黄油似乎会增加淀粉吸收不良的部分,当黄油量增加到26克时,这种效果就消失了。