Nelson D A, Barondess D A
Department of Internal Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan 48201, USA.
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1997 Jun;103(2):157-62. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199706)103:2<157::AID-AJPA2>3.0.CO;2-R.
We measured whole body bone, fat and lean mass, by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, of third-grade children in a suburban public school district adjacent to Detroit. Of 1,340 eligible children, 773 participated. Using U.S. Census categories, parents identified their children as black/African-American (57%), white (38%), or one of several other categories (5%). Some of the participants also identified with a relatively large Middle Eastern subgroup (Chaldeans). Of the 773 participants, 734 are included in this report (71 Chaldeans, 226 whites, and 437 black/African-Americans; other categories are omitted). We describe body size, body composition, and physical activity levels in the three groups. The Chaldean and black children have significantly higher average whole body bone mineral content (BMC) than whites (P > 0.05), but are not different from each other. Lean mass and height are significantly greater for Chaldeans and blacks than for whites. The ratio of BMC to height was also significantly greater in Chaldeans and blacks compared with whites. Chaldeans have a significantly higher weight and fat mass than either the black or white children, and report significantly less physical activity than either the white or the black children. The higher bone mass among the Chaldean children may be partially explained by their greater body mass, but there is no readily apparent explanation for the observed ethnic differences in body size. We cannot exclude genetic or environmental factors not evaluated in this observational study. Our unexpected finding that Chaldean children, when analyzed as a separate group, are more similar in body composition to black/African-American than to white children contributes to a growing body of literature indicating that the uncritical use of "race" categories may obscure rather than facilitate the identification of population differences.
我们通过双能X线吸收法测量了底特律市郊一个公立学区三年级儿童的全身骨骼、脂肪和瘦体重。在1340名符合条件的儿童中,773名参与了研究。家长们按照美国人口普查的类别,将他们的孩子认定为黑人/非裔美国人(57%)、白人(38%)或其他几个类别之一(5%)。一些参与者还属于一个相对较大的中东子群体(迦勒底人)。在773名参与者中,本报告纳入了734名(71名迦勒底人、226名白人、437名黑人/非裔美国人;其他类别被省略)。我们描述了这三组儿童的体型、身体成分和身体活动水平。迦勒底儿童和黑人儿童的平均全身骨矿物质含量(BMC)显著高于白人儿童(P>0.05),但两者之间没有差异。迦勒底儿童和黑人儿童的瘦体重和身高显著高于白人儿童。迦勒底儿童和黑人儿童的BMC与身高之比也显著高于白人儿童。迦勒底儿童的体重和脂肪量显著高于黑人或白人儿童,并且报告的身体活动显著少于白人或黑人儿童。迦勒底儿童较高的骨量可能部分归因于他们较大的体重,但对于观察到的体型种族差异,目前尚无明显的解释。我们不能排除在这项观察性研究中未评估的遗传或环境因素。我们意外地发现,迦勒底儿童作为一个单独的群体进行分析时,其身体成分与黑人/非裔美国人比与白人儿童更为相似,这一发现为越来越多的文献提供了补充,这些文献表明不加区分地使用“种族”类别可能会掩盖而非有助于识别群体差异。