• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

南澳大利亚州的癫痫与驾驶——强制通报评估

Epilepsy and driving in South Australia--an assessment of compulsory notification.

作者信息

Black A B, Lai N Y

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, South Australia.

出版信息

Med Law. 1997;16(2):253-67.

PMID:9212618
Abstract

We examined the licensing of drivers with conditions likely to endanger the public in a State in which doctors are obliged to notify the licensing authority. During 1991, 1460 medically endorsed licenses were cancelled. A sample of 245, including all 49 with epilepsy were mostly voluntary, the twenty exceptions with retained files being drivers with epilepsy. In the same period, 115 traffic accidents were attributed to illness, with the only four (4) investigated by the licensing authority being those with licenses endorsed "epilepsy" where a seizure was responsible. Compulsory notification appeared to result in the identification of epilepsy as the important medical reason for controlling licenses, but failed to recognise sleep disorders or alcoholism, both more significant causes of traffic accidents. In those accidents attributed to illness, almost no action was taken to review the medical fitness of drivers, suggesting a reliance on doctors rather than police or road safety authorities.

摘要

我们在一个医生有义务通知发证机构的州,对患有可能危及公众安全疾病的司机的驾照许可情况进行了调查。1991年期间,1460份经医学认可的驾照被吊销。抽取的245个样本,包括所有49名癫痫患者,大多是自愿吊销的,20份留有档案的例外情况是癫痫患者司机。同一时期,115起交通事故被归咎于疾病,发证机构仅调查了4起,都是驾照上批注“癫痫”且事故由癫痫发作导致的情况。强制通知似乎促使将癫痫认定为控制驾照的重要医学原因,但未能识别出睡眠障碍或酗酒问题,而这两者都是导致交通事故的更重要原因。在那些归因于疾病的事故中,几乎没有采取任何行动来审查司机的医学适宜性,这表明依赖的是医生而非警察或道路安全当局。

相似文献

1
Epilepsy and driving in South Australia--an assessment of compulsory notification.南澳大利亚州的癫痫与驾驶——强制通报评估
Med Law. 1997;16(2):253-67.
2
[Epilepsy and driving].[癫痫与驾驶]
Brain Nerve. 2013 Jan;65(1):67-75.
3
[Epilepsy and driving].
Nihon Rinsho. 2014 May;72(5):939-45.
4
Epilepsy and driving: a survey of automobile accidents attributed to seizure.癫痫与驾驶:一项关于归因于癫痫发作的汽车事故的调查。
Jpn J Psychiatry Neurol. 1991 Jun;45(2):327-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.1991.tb02481.x.
5
Ethical implications of Italian legislation on 'epilepsy and driving'.意大利“癫痫与驾驶”相关立法的伦理影响
J Med Ethics. 2014 Aug;40(8):552-7. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100863. Epub 2013 Jul 30.
6
Driving to distraction--certification of fitness to drive with epilepsy.驾车出行的困扰——癫痫患者驾驶适宜性的认证。
Med J Aust. 2010 Mar 15;192(6):342-4. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03535.x.
7
Reporting epileptic drivers to licensing authorities is unnecessary and counterproductive.
Ann Emerg Med. 2002 Jun;39(6):656-9. doi: 10.1067/mem.2002.121520.
8
Impact of New Regulations On Assessing Driving Status (INROADS): a South Australian seizure clinic cohort.新法规对驾驶状态评估的影响(INROADS):南澳大利亚癫痫发作诊所队列研究
J Clin Neurosci. 2014 Nov;21(11):1920-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.03.028. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
9
Driving and epilepsy: a prospective questionnaire survey in Japan. Committee on Driver's Licenses, the Japan Epilepsy Society, Shizuoka.驾驶与癫痫:日本的一项前瞻性问卷调查。日本癫痫协会静冈驾照委员会
Jpn J Psychiatry Neurol. 1991 Jun;45(2):319-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.1991.tb02479.x.
10
Epilepsy and driving: current status of research.癫痫与驾驶:研究现状。
Epilepsy Res. 2012 Dec;102(3):135-52. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2012.08.003. Epub 2012 Sep 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Epilepsy and driving.癫痫与驾驶
BMJ. 2005 Jul 9;331(7508):60-1. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7508.60.
2
Cross sectional study of reporting of epileptic seizures to general practitioners.向全科医生报告癫痫发作情况的横断面研究。
BMJ. 2000 Jan 8;320(7227):94-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7227.94.