• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应如何分析CD34+细胞?对三类抗体和五种白细胞制备程序的研究。

How should CD34+ cells be analysed? A study of three classes of antibody and five leucocyte preparation procedures.

作者信息

Macey M G, McCarthy D A, van Agthoven A, Newland A C

机构信息

Department of Haematology, Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel, UK.

出版信息

J Immunol Methods. 1997 May 26;204(2):175-88. doi: 10.1016/s0022-1759(97)00045-8.

DOI:10.1016/s0022-1759(97)00045-8
PMID:9212835
Abstract

For patients undergoing stem cell transplantation after intensive marrow ablative therapy it is important to enumerate the CD34+ stem cells in peripheral blood so that the harvest can be timed in order to maximize the number of cells collected by leucophoresis for subsequent haematopoietic reconstitution. The use of rapid flow cytometric techniques for the determination CD34+ leucocyte numbers has been advocated, although there is no consensus as to the best method. In this study, we have examined the effects of preparation procedures for flow cytometry on the binding of four CD34 antibodies (Immu-133, QBEND-10, HPCA2 and BIRMA-K3) to the three classes of epitopes on leucocytes. Whole blood, bone marrow and leucophoresis samples were analysed either directly after labelling with a vital nuclear dye (LDS-751) and fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies or after additional erythrocyte lysis and leucocyte fixation using four commercially available reagents (Q-Prep, OptiLyse B, OptiLyse C and FACS Lysing Solution). By comparison with the results obtained from viable leucocytes in unmanipulated samples, it was found that the binding of all four antibodies could be affected by lysis and fixation procedures and that the binding of the class I antibody Immu-133 was most markedly decreased. We conclude that CD34+ cells are best analysed using a whole blood procedure in which nucleated cells are identified by their side light scatter and the fluorescence associated with a vital nuclear dye (in this instance LDS-751) and the CD34+ cells are detected with fluorescein isothiocyanate- or phycoerythrin-conjugated antibodies.

摘要

对于在强化骨髓清除疗法后接受干细胞移植的患者,对外周血中的CD34+干细胞进行计数很重要,这样可以确定采集时机,以便通过白细胞分离术收集到最大数量的细胞,用于后续的造血重建。尽管对于最佳方法尚无共识,但有人主张使用快速流式细胞术技术来测定CD34+白细胞数量。在本研究中,我们检测了流式细胞术的样本制备程序对四种CD34抗体(Immu-133、QBEND-10、HPCA2和BIRMA-K3)与白细胞上三类表位结合的影响。全血、骨髓和白细胞分离术样本在用活性核染料(LDS-751)和荧光素偶联抗体标记后,或在使用四种市售试剂(Q-Prep、OptiLyse B、OptiLyse C和FACS Lysing Solution)进行额外的红细胞裂解和白细胞固定后,直接进行分析。与未处理样本中活白细胞的结果相比,发现所有四种抗体的结合都可能受到裂解和固定程序的影响,其中I类抗体Immu-133的结合减少最为明显。我们得出结论,分析CD34+细胞的最佳方法是采用全血程序,其中有核细胞通过侧向光散射和与活性核染料(在本研究中为LDS-751)相关的荧光来识别,CD34+细胞则用异硫氰酸荧光素或藻红蛋白偶联抗体进行检测。

相似文献

1
How should CD34+ cells be analysed? A study of three classes of antibody and five leucocyte preparation procedures.应如何分析CD34+细胞?对三类抗体和五种白细胞制备程序的研究。
J Immunol Methods. 1997 May 26;204(2):175-88. doi: 10.1016/s0022-1759(97)00045-8.
2
The influence of different erythrocyte lysing procedures on flow cytometric determination of CD34+ cells in umbilical cord blood transplants.不同红细胞裂解程序对脐带血移植中CD34+细胞流式细胞术测定的影响。
Transfus Med. 1998 Jun;8(2):111-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3148.1998.00135.x.
3
Comparative evaluation of commonly used clones and fluorochrome conjugates of monoclonal antibodies for CD34 antigen detection.用于CD34抗原检测的单克隆抗体常用克隆及荧光染料偶联物的比较评估
J Hematother Stem Cell Res. 1999 Oct;8(5):547-59. doi: 10.1089/152581699319993.
4
Expression of class I, II and III epitopes of the CD34 antigen by normal and leukemic hemopoietic cells.正常和白血病造血细胞对CD34抗原的I类、II类和III类表位的表达。
Cytometry. 1996 Jun 15;26(2):154-60. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19960615)26:2<154::AID-CYTO9>3.0.CO;2-G.
5
Flow cytometric enumeration of CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells in leukapheresis product and bone marrow for clinical transplantation: a comparison of three methods.流式细胞术对临床移植用白细胞单采产品和骨髓中CD34+造血干细胞和祖细胞的计数:三种方法的比较
Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 2006;44(1):53-60.
6
Differences in phycoerythrin- or fluorescein-isothiocyanate conjugated 8G12 on CD34+ cell evaluation.藻红蛋白或异硫氰酸荧光素偶联的8G12在CD34+细胞评估中的差异。
Haematologica. 1997 May-Jun;82(3):334-5.
7
Quantitative fluorescence flow cytometry: a comparison of the three techniques for direct and indirect immunofluorescence.定量荧光流式细胞术:直接和间接免疫荧光三种技术的比较
Cytometry. 1998 Oct 1;33(2):179-87. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0320(19981001)33:2<179::aid-cyto12>3.0.co;2-r.
8
Concordant expression of class II and class III CD34 epitopes on haemopoietic cells in leukapheresis and cord blood samples with CD45/CD34 dual staining.采用CD45/CD34双重染色法检测白细胞分离样本和脐血样本中造血细胞上II类和III类CD34表位的一致性表达。
Br J Haematol. 1997 May;97(2):488-91. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1997.602716.x.
9
Analysis of variation in results of CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cell enumeration in a multicenter study.一项多中心研究中CD34+造血祖细胞计数结果的变异分析。
Cytometry. 1997 Jun 15;30(3):109-17. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0320(19970615)30:3<109::aid-cyto1>3.0.co;2-g.
10
The Q-Prep system: effects on the apparent expression of leucocyte cell surface antigens.
Cytometry. 1997 Apr 15;30(2):67-71. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0320(19970415)30:2<67::aid-cyto1>3.0.co;2-a.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterization of a Novel Monoclonal Antibody (27H2) Recognizing Human CD34 Class III Epitope.鉴定一种新型单克隆抗体(27H2)识别人 CD34 Ⅲ类表位。
Immune Netw. 2010 Dec;10(6):239-46. doi: 10.4110/in.2010.10.6.239. Epub 2010 Dec 31.
2
UK NEQAS for leucocyte immunophenotyping: the first 10 years.英国白细胞免疫表型分析外部质量评估计划:头10年
J Clin Pathol. 2001 Jul;54(7):508-11. doi: 10.1136/jcp.54.7.508.