Macey M G, McCarthy D A, van Agthoven A, Newland A C
Department of Haematology, Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel, UK.
J Immunol Methods. 1997 May 26;204(2):175-88. doi: 10.1016/s0022-1759(97)00045-8.
For patients undergoing stem cell transplantation after intensive marrow ablative therapy it is important to enumerate the CD34+ stem cells in peripheral blood so that the harvest can be timed in order to maximize the number of cells collected by leucophoresis for subsequent haematopoietic reconstitution. The use of rapid flow cytometric techniques for the determination CD34+ leucocyte numbers has been advocated, although there is no consensus as to the best method. In this study, we have examined the effects of preparation procedures for flow cytometry on the binding of four CD34 antibodies (Immu-133, QBEND-10, HPCA2 and BIRMA-K3) to the three classes of epitopes on leucocytes. Whole blood, bone marrow and leucophoresis samples were analysed either directly after labelling with a vital nuclear dye (LDS-751) and fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies or after additional erythrocyte lysis and leucocyte fixation using four commercially available reagents (Q-Prep, OptiLyse B, OptiLyse C and FACS Lysing Solution). By comparison with the results obtained from viable leucocytes in unmanipulated samples, it was found that the binding of all four antibodies could be affected by lysis and fixation procedures and that the binding of the class I antibody Immu-133 was most markedly decreased. We conclude that CD34+ cells are best analysed using a whole blood procedure in which nucleated cells are identified by their side light scatter and the fluorescence associated with a vital nuclear dye (in this instance LDS-751) and the CD34+ cells are detected with fluorescein isothiocyanate- or phycoerythrin-conjugated antibodies.
对于在强化骨髓清除疗法后接受干细胞移植的患者,对外周血中的CD34+干细胞进行计数很重要,这样可以确定采集时机,以便通过白细胞分离术收集到最大数量的细胞,用于后续的造血重建。尽管对于最佳方法尚无共识,但有人主张使用快速流式细胞术技术来测定CD34+白细胞数量。在本研究中,我们检测了流式细胞术的样本制备程序对四种CD34抗体(Immu-133、QBEND-10、HPCA2和BIRMA-K3)与白细胞上三类表位结合的影响。全血、骨髓和白细胞分离术样本在用活性核染料(LDS-751)和荧光素偶联抗体标记后,或在使用四种市售试剂(Q-Prep、OptiLyse B、OptiLyse C和FACS Lysing Solution)进行额外的红细胞裂解和白细胞固定后,直接进行分析。与未处理样本中活白细胞的结果相比,发现所有四种抗体的结合都可能受到裂解和固定程序的影响,其中I类抗体Immu-133的结合减少最为明显。我们得出结论,分析CD34+细胞的最佳方法是采用全血程序,其中有核细胞通过侧向光散射和与活性核染料(在本研究中为LDS-751)相关的荧光来识别,CD34+细胞则用异硫氰酸荧光素或藻红蛋白偶联抗体进行检测。