Pellitteri P K, Robbins K T, Neuman T
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania 17822, USA.
Head Neck. 1997 Jul;19(4):260-5. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0347(199707)19:4<260::aid-hed3>3.0.co;2-z.
The efficacy of extending the application of selective neck dissection to include more-extensive neck disease in patients with squamous carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract remains controversial.
A review of all patients undergoing selective neck dissection at a single institution during a 5-year period was undertaken. The analysis was conducted on 82 patients who received 94 selective neck dissections as part of initial therapy for management of squamous carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract, including: oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx, and hypopharynx.
Forty-six of the 94 dissected necks were supraomohyoid dissections, and 48 were lateral neck dissections. Sixty-five percent of patients were followed a minimum of 2 years and formed the cohort for final analysis. There were eight regional recurrences, three of which occurred in the contralateral, undissected neck. The regional recurrence rate for all patients undergoing selective neck dissection, with or without radiotherapy, according to pathologic N status was as follows: NO (1/33), 3%; N1 (1/8), 12.5%; and multiple positive nodes (3/26), 11.5%. A comparison of recurrence rates with respect to extent of neck disease (N0-N1 versus multiple positive nodes) for both types of neck dissection did not demonstrate significant differences; supraomohyoid neck dissection, p < .5; lateral neck dissection, p < .25.
There exists an expanded role for selective neck dissection in selected patients with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract and multiple N+ cervical disease. The selection of patients who are candidates for selective lymphadenectomy should be based on pathoanatomic considerations with reference to the primary site of tumor and demonstrated level(s) of metastatic involvement.
对于选择性颈部清扫术应用范围扩大至涵盖上消化道鳞状细胞癌患者更广泛的颈部疾病,其疗效仍存在争议。
对某单一机构5年内接受选择性颈部清扫术的所有患者进行回顾性研究。分析对象为82例患者,他们接受了94次选择性颈部清扫术,作为上消化道鳞状细胞癌(包括口腔、口咽、喉和下咽)初始治疗的一部分。
94例清扫的颈部中,46例为肩胛舌骨肌上清扫术,48例为侧颈清扫术。65%的患者至少随访了2年,并构成最终分析的队列。有8例区域复发,其中3例发生在对侧未清扫的颈部。根据病理N分期,所有接受选择性颈部清扫术的患者,无论是否接受放疗,区域复发率如下:N0(1/33),3%;N1(1/8),12.5%;多个阳性淋巴结(3/26),11.5%。两种颈部清扫术在颈部疾病范围(N0 - N1与多个阳性淋巴结)方面的复发率比较未显示出显著差异;肩胛舌骨肌上颈部清扫术,p < 0.5;侧颈清扫术,p < 0.25。
对于部分患有上消化道原发性鳞状细胞癌且伴有多个N + 颈部疾病的患者,选择性颈部清扫术有更广泛的应用价值。选择性淋巴结切除术候选患者的选择应基于病理解剖学考虑,参考肿瘤的原发部位和已证实的转移受累水平。