Suppr超能文献

脊柱大手术后深静脉血栓形成的预防:外部装置的比较研究

Prevention of deep-vein thrombosis after major spinal surgery: a comparison study of external devices.

作者信息

Wood K B, Kos P B, Abnet J K, Ista C

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.

出版信息

J Spinal Disord. 1997 Jun;10(3):209-14.

PMID:9213276
Abstract

We studied the difference in postoperative thrombotic complications after major spinal surgery between two commonly used external compression devices. Our 136 subjects were prospectively randomized to receive either thigh-high sequential pneumatic compression wraps or pneumatic foot-compression wraps. All were studied postoperatively with duplex ultrasonography and analyzed for leg swelling, the rate of thrombotic events, and overall subjective patient comfort. The rate of postoperative thrombosis was 1.5%. The one pulmonary embolism was successfully treated with heparin. One other patient had a small asymptomatic thrombus of the saphenous vein. Both subjects wore foot wraps. Subjectively, the devices were rated as being equally comfortable. We believe that external compression for thrombosis prophylaxis after major spinal surgery is effective. The particular device chosen may be driven by other factors such as cost, physician or nursing preference, and ease of application.

摘要

我们研究了两种常用的外部压迫装置在脊柱大手术后的术后血栓形成并发症方面的差异。我们的136名受试者被前瞻性随机分组,分别接受大腿高位序贯气动压迫绷带或气动足部压迫绷带。所有受试者术后均接受双功超声检查,并分析腿部肿胀情况、血栓形成事件发生率以及患者总体主观舒适度。术后血栓形成率为1.5%。1例肺栓塞患者经肝素治疗成功。另1例患者有小的无症状隐静脉血栓。两名受试者均使用足部绷带。主观上,这些装置的舒适度被评为相同。我们认为,脊柱大手术后用于预防血栓形成的外部压迫是有效的。所选择的具体装置可能受其他因素驱动,如成本、医生或护士的偏好以及应用的便利性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验