[Relationship between late ventricular potentials and ventricular arrhythmias in patients in chronic dialysis treatment].

BACKGROUND

Arrhythmias are frequent pathology in patients with chronic hemodialysis. We evaluated whether a relatively new technique, signal averaging, could be useful in predicting the development of complex arrhythmias in these patients.

METHODS

Thirty-three patients, 18 male and 15 female, subjected to thrice weekly chronic hemodialytic treatment with various dialysis techniques, were studied. Exclusion criteria were the presence of antiarrhythmic and inotropic treatment. The following examinations were carried out in all patients: a Holter dynamic electrocardiography for a duration of 24 hours, begun on the day of dialysis, high resolution ECG pre- and post-dialysis to find out if there were any ventricular late potential (VLP). Four hundred beats were examined in order to obtain a background noise of less than 0.7 microV and a better definition of the signal. The following parameters were considered significant for the presence of VLP: a) filtered QRS duration > 120 msec; b) the root mean square of the signal expressed in the terminal portion of QRS (RMS) < 25 microV) high frequency low amplitude signals duration (HFLA) > 40 msec. A positive value in two of these parameters was considered indicative of the presence of VLP. In addition various pre and post-dialysis indices of dialytic efficiency and a mono and two-dimensional echocardiogram with pulsed and color Doppler were carried out. Of the 33 patients studied, ten were excluded because they presented too high a background noise at the high resolution ECG. Of the remaining 23 patients, 13 (56%) presented VLP and nine of these (69%) presented complex arrhythmias. Of the ten patients without VLP, 5 (50%) presented complex arrhythmias. The incidence of arrhythmias was highest during the last two hours of dialysis and in the two hours following it. The patients were then divided into two groups (A and B) according to the ejection fraction (EF) found at the echocardiogram. Group A was composed of 17 patients of whom 8 (47%) presented complex arrhythmias; group B (EF < 45%) was composed of the remaining six patients, who all presented complex arrhythmias. In group A nine patients (53%) out of 17 had LVP, in group B four out of six (66%) had it. All the patients except one presented an increase in the thickness of the ventricular wall and alterations of Doppler transmitral filling rate. Left ventricular hypertrophy was diagnosed in 22 out of the 23 patients. Four patients also had chronic ischaemic heart disease; of these three had LVP. There was no correlation between the presence of LVP and the hemodialytic indices and between the latter and complex arrhythmias.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that arrhythmias are more frequent in patients with LVP before dialysis than in those without. The difference was statistically significant (p < 0.006); the incidence of arrhythmias was higher in patients with FE < 45% (p < 0.001). The majority of patients (95%) had left ventricular hypertrophy; only four (17%) had ischaemic heart disease too. It is highly probable that the presence of LVP in our patients can be attributed to hypertension and subsequent left ventricular hypertrophy. As patients with LVP at the end of dialysis had a greater incidence of arrhythmias than those without LVP, we suggest that this method could be useful as a first screening in dialysed patients.