Fromme A, Reer R, Pichol A, Jerosch J
Institut für Sportmedizin der Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universität Münster.
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1997 Mar-Apr;135(2):157-61. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1039573.
In spite of educational work for many years by the orthopaedic surgeons wrong lifting techniques are still used in everyday life as well as during exercise. The reason for this could be the fact that there is an advantage regarding these techniques from the energetic point of view.
To clarify this issue we examined 30 healthy males within the age range of 17 and 30 years (weight: 74.0 +/- 9.2 kg, height: 182.5 +/- 6.7 cm). In a randomised sequence the volunteers carried out two different lifting techniques: 1. Lifting with stretched legs and bent back, 2. Lifting with bent legs and stretched back (Brügger technique). The test scheme consisted of four different 3-minute exercise levels with increasing weights (0 kg, 5.2 kg, 12.1 kg, 19.2 kg), the repetition rate was 30 times per level.
Using the Brügger technique the results for heart rate, VO2, VCO2 and VE were highly significant (p < 0.001) above the results of the other technique at all exercise levels. On the RPE (rate of perceived exertion) scale the differences were statistically significant regarding the 0.01-level.
The results give rise to the supposition that the energy consumption for the lifting technique with the bent back is lower and is therefore preferred in everyday life and during exercise. These findings should be taken into consideration when informing people about possible damages.
尽管骨科医生多年来一直在开展教育工作,但在日常生活以及运动过程中,错误的举重技术仍被使用。原因可能是从能量角度来看,这些技术存在优势。
为阐明这一问题,我们对30名年龄在17至30岁之间的健康男性进行了检查(体重:74.0±9.2千克,身高:182.5±6.7厘米)。志愿者们以随机顺序进行两种不同的举重技术:1. 腿部伸展且背部弯曲时举重,2. 腿部弯曲且背部伸展时举重(布鲁格技术)。测试方案包括四个不同的3分钟运动水平,重量逐渐增加(0千克、5.2千克、12.1千克、19.2千克),每个水平的重复次数为30次。
在所有运动水平上,使用布鲁格技术时,心率、摄氧量、二氧化碳排出量和每分通气量的结果均显著高于另一种技术(p<0.001)。在主观用力感觉(RPE)量表上,差异在0.01水平具有统计学意义。
结果使人推测,背部弯曲的举重技术能量消耗较低,因此在日常生活和运动中更受青睐。在告知人们可能的损伤时,应考虑这些发现。