Revuelta N, Dauphin A, Kowslowski O, Dubois D, Thevenon A
Service de Reeducation et Readaptation Fonctionnelle, C.H.R.U de Lille, France.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Jul;81(7):958-9. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2000.5614.
To determine the heart rate response to repetitive lifting of light weights employing two techniques, stoop and squat.
Randomized cross-over trial.
Twenty healthy volunteers (11 women, 9 men), mean age of 25 years, recruited from the staff of a physical medicine and rehabilitation department.
Subjects lifted and lowered a box weighing 0, 1, or 3 kg, using the stoop (bent at waist with knees straight) and squat (knees bent) techniques, 20 times in 1 minute.
The heart rate was recorded every 5 seconds during the effort aid 30 seconds and 1 minute after the test.
Significantly higher heart rates were found during both the test and recuperation phases of the squat technique with each of the three loads (p < .05). The heart rate increase was also higher with the 3 kg load than with the 1 kg or 0 kg load (p = .0001).
The heart rate is lower using the stoop technique for lifting. This may explain why individuals choose the more ergonomically risky stoop technique in everyday lifting tasks.
采用弯腰和深蹲两种技术,确定重复提起轻重量物体时的心率反应。
随机交叉试验。
从物理医学与康复科工作人员中招募的20名健康志愿者(11名女性,9名男性),平均年龄25岁。
受试者使用弯腰(腰部弯曲,膝盖伸直)和深蹲(膝盖弯曲)技术,在1分钟内将一个重0、1或3千克的箱子提起并放下20次。
在测试过程中每5秒记录一次心率,并在测试后30秒和1分钟记录心率。
在深蹲技术的测试和恢复阶段,使用三种负荷中的任何一种时,心率均显著更高(p < .05)。与1千克或0千克负荷相比,3千克负荷时心率增加也更高(p = .0001)。
使用弯腰技术提起重物时心率较低。这可能解释了为什么在日常提举任务中,人们会选择在人体工程学上更具风险的弯腰技术。