Robertson P A, Brown J S, Flanagan T A, Goldman M E, Learman L A, Stevens A E, Wilcox N
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, University of California Medical Center, San Francisco, USA.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Jun;176(6):1368-73. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70360-0.
Our objectives were to (1) expand and strengthen the women's health curriculum at the University of California, San Francisco, and (2) evaluate the responses of both medical students and faculty to this curriculum.
A written evaluation of the curriculum in women's health was completed by both students and faculty. Variables studied included mean scores of cases, the overall course score, and the preferences of medical students for faculty specialty in teaching the small groups.
The overall course evaluation score was 7.81 (range 1 to 10). For those students who had both faculty from internal medicine or family medicine and obstetrics and gynecology, there was a strong preference that obstetrician-gynecologists teach the majority of the cases.
The new case-based curriculum in women's health was enthusiastically received by both medical students and faculty.
我们的目标是：（1）扩展并强化加州大学旧金山分校的女性健康课程；（2）评估医学生和教师对该课程的反应。
学生和教师都完成了对女性健康课程的书面评估。所研究的变量包括病例的平均得分、课程总体得分，以及医学生对小组教学中教师专业的偏好。
课程总体评估得分为7.81（范围为1至10）。对于那些既有内科或家庭医学教师又有妇产科教师授课的学生，他们强烈倾向于由妇产科医生讲授大部分病例。
新的基于病例的女性健康课程受到了医学生和教师的热烈欢迎。
