Sinoff G, Ore L
Department of Geriatrics, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997 Jul;45(7):832-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb01510.x.
The Barthel Index for assessing activities of daily living (ADL) was developed particularly for young stroke patients, but it now has a wider application in the geriatric assessment profile. This study tests the validity of the Barthel Index by self-report in the old-old (> or = 75 years). If more than 10% of the studied population assessed themselves incorrectly (> or = 15-point discrepancy), the test may have limitations. We set out to try to quantify and explain this discrepancy.
During a 3-month period, we tested 126 old-old patients, both geriatric medical inpatients and subjects from the community, in a cross-sectional study. Using the Barthel Index, their functional status was assessed by self-report and by observation of performance. A measure of the magnitude of discrepancy between the two methods (discrepancy score) was calculated as the difference between the self-report and performance total scores.
Comparing the self-report with actual ADL performance scores, the mean score for self-report was higher (90 vs 88). There was a low Kappa score in all areas of the scale (range 0.103-0.398). Twenty of the 126 patients (15.9%) scored 15 or more points in the discrepancy score. By running a multiple linear regression, we were able to explain only 21% of the variance in the discrepancy score (R2 = .21). Significant explanatory variables were the presence of cognitive impairment, source of patients from acute geriatric ward, and age (very old > or = 85 years).
For the purpose of this study, use of the Barthel Index by self-reporting was found to have its limitations in the old-old (> or = 75 years), particularly with regard to the very old (> or = 85 years) medical geriatric inpatients. Therefore, we suggest that the older people may have to be assessed by the rehabilitation services using a performance-based measure or a different self-report test for documenting their activities of daily living, bearing in mind that self-reported and performance-based measures capture physical abilities differently.
用于评估日常生活活动(ADL)的巴氏指数最初是为年轻中风患者开发的,但现在在老年评估中应用更为广泛。本研究通过自我报告来检验巴氏指数在高龄老人(≥75岁)中的有效性。如果超过10%的研究人群自我评估错误(差异≥15分),则该测试可能存在局限性。我们试图对这种差异进行量化并加以解释。
在一项横断面研究中,我们在3个月的时间里对126名高龄老人进行了测试,这些老人包括老年医学住院患者和社区受试者。使用巴氏指数,通过自我报告和实际表现观察对他们的功能状态进行评估。两种方法之间差异程度的度量(差异分数)计算为自我报告总分与实际表现总分之间的差值。
将自我报告与实际ADL表现分数进行比较,自我报告的平均分数更高(90分对88分)。量表所有领域的kappa分数都较低(范围为0.103 - 0.398)。126名患者中有20名(15.9%)的差异分数达到15分或更高。通过进行多元线性回归,我们仅能解释差异分数中21%的方差(R2 = 0.21)。显著的解释变量包括认知障碍的存在、患者来自急性老年病房以及年龄(高龄≥85岁)。
就本研究而言,发现自我报告使用巴氏指数在高龄老人(≥75岁)中存在局限性,尤其是对于高龄(≥85岁)的老年医学住院患者。因此,我们建议康复服务机构可能需要使用基于实际表现的测量方法或不同的自我报告测试来评估老年人的日常生活活动,同时要记住自我报告和基于实际表现的测量方法对身体能力的捕捉方式不同。