Sorock G S, Smith G S, Reeve G R, Dement J, Stout N, Layne L, Pastula S T
Liberty Mutual Research Center for Safety & Health, Hopkinton, MA 01748, USA.
Am J Ind Med. 1997 Aug;32(2):116-28. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199708)32:2<116::aid-ajim3>3.0.co;2-x.
This paper reviews surveillance approaches for occupational injuries and evaluates three emerging methodologies for the enhancement of work-related injury surveillance: (1) narrative data analysis, (2) data set linkage, and (3) comprehensive company-wide surveillance systems. All three methods are the result of new applications of computer hardware and software that have apparent strengths and limitations. A major strength is the improved description of work exposures and related injuries leading to better understanding of injury etiology. This understanding, however, is limited by the data quality and completeness entered on records at the time of the injury. We recommend (1) more widespread inclusion of narrative text in databases, analyses of which can be a valuable supplement to injury coded data; (2) the increased use of data set linkage studies to combine injury and work-history data; and (3) the development of comprehensive company-wide surveillance systems to expedite the use of epidemiologic data for occupational injury prevention activities. Further development of these methods and others is encouraged, especially in light of technological advancements in data capture, analysis and presentation. Only through such efforts can we best apply epidemiologic principles to preventing injuries in the workplace.
本文回顾了职业伤害的监测方法,并评估了三种用于加强与工作相关伤害监测的新兴方法:(1)叙述性数据分析,(2)数据集链接,以及(3)全公司范围的综合监测系统。这三种方法都是计算机硬件和软件新应用的结果,它们都有明显的优点和局限性。一个主要优点是对工作暴露和相关伤害的描述得到了改进,从而能更好地理解伤害的病因。然而,这种理解受到伤害发生时记录中输入的数据质量和完整性的限制。我们建议:(1)在数据库中更广泛地纳入叙述性文本,对其进行分析可以作为伤害编码数据的宝贵补充;(2)更多地使用数据集链接研究来整合伤害数据和工作经历数据;(3)开发全公司范围的综合监测系统,以加快将流行病学数据用于职业伤害预防活动。鼓励进一步开发这些方法和其他方法,特别是鉴于数据采集、分析和呈现方面的技术进步。只有通过这些努力,我们才能最好地应用流行病学原理来预防工作场所的伤害。