Geriatric Institute Camillo Golgi, Abbiategrasso (Ml), Italy.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2009;49 Suppl 1:39-48. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2009.09.011.
The clock drawing test (CDT) is an easy to apply, well accepted and reliable test that is widely used to screen for visuo-constructional difficulties in the aged people. Yet, besides visual agnosia and constructional apraxia, executive control influences performances in this task. Execution modalities and rating schemes vary widely, as for the way stimuli are proposed, the time to which the clock is set, and the elements that are considered for scoring. The scoring system we have selected is called clock drawing interpretation scale (CDIS) contains 20 items in 3 areas: visuo-perceptual, attentional and numerical factors. Our aim is to know the meanings of the CDIS total and sub-areas score, investigating the relationships with specific neuropsychological tests, in elderly persons with moderate cognitive impairment. CDIS has been administered to 90 people, aged about 75 years, attending our rehabilitative day hospital or our memory clinic. A neuropsychological battery has been administered to a sample of 47 outpatients, selected by contingence. Respective mean MMSE for the 2 samples are 24 and 25.1 (adjusted for age and education). The score method shows good internal consistency, with Cronbach's a about 0.75, either for total score or for the 3 sub-scores. Both total score and all sub-scores share correlations with mini mental state examination (MMSE), geriatric depression scale (GDS 5-item form), digit-symbol test, phonetic fluency and constructional apraxia tests. Total score and Group A (visuo-perceptive items) correlate also with cancellation attentional matrices, trail making test A and B, Corsi's cubes and Raven's colored matrices. Group B (attention items) and Group C (numerical factors) lack some of these correlations (Pearson correlation coefficients between 0.264 and 0.629). Neither CDIS total score nor sub-scores (except for numerical factors) correlate with verbal learning and memory. CDIS total cores correlates also with the level of education (r=0.418; p=0.001), but not with age. In conclusion, the clock drawing test, scored by the 20-item CDIS, looks as a homogeneous and analytic test, which is focused on visuo-perceptive and executive skills, while it disregards verbal learning and memory, in elderly people with moderate cognitive impairment. Its 3-item groups show good internal consistency; they also plausibly correlate to specific neuropsychological tests. The almost overlapping results of total and visuo-perceptual sub-score come from the way the test is performed and evaluated. The correlation between CDIS and GDS confirms the relevance of mood towards executive functions.
时钟绘画测试(CDT)是一种易于应用、广为接受且可靠的测试,广泛用于筛查老年人的视觉建构困难。然而,除了视觉识别障碍和建构性失用症外,执行控制也会影响此任务的表现。执行方式和评分方案差异很大,例如刺激的呈现方式、设置时钟的时间以及用于评分的元素。我们选择的评分系统称为时钟绘画解释量表(CDIS),包含 3 个区域的 20 个项目:视觉感知、注意力和数值因素。我们的目的是了解 CDIS 总分和子区域分数的含义,研究其与特定神经心理学测试在认知障碍程度中等的老年人中的关系。CDIS 已在我们康复日间医院或记忆诊所的 90 名年龄约 75 岁的患者中进行了评估。通过偶然选择,对 47 名门诊患者进行了神经心理学测试。对于这两个样本,相应的 MMSE 平均值分别为 24 和 25.1(根据年龄和教育进行了调整)。评分方法显示出良好的内部一致性,Cronbach's α 约为 0.75,无论是总分还是 3 个子分数。总分和所有子分数均与简易精神状态检查(MMSE)、老年抑郁量表(GDS 5 项形式)、数字符号测试、语音流畅性和建构性失用测试相关。总分和 A 组(视觉感知项目)还与注意力取消矩阵、追踪测试 A 和 B、科西的立方体和雷文的彩色矩阵相关。B 组(注意力项目)和 C 组(数值因素)缺乏其中一些相关性(Pearson 相关系数在 0.264 到 0.629 之间)。CDIS 总分和子分数(数值因素除外)均与言语学习和记忆无关。CDIS 总分还与教育程度相关(r=0.418;p=0.001),但与年龄无关。总之,时钟绘画测试(通过 20 项 CDIS 进行评分)看起来是一种同质且分析性的测试,主要关注视觉感知和执行技能,而忽略了认知障碍程度中等的老年人的言语学习和记忆。它的 3 个项目组显示出良好的内部一致性;它们还与特定的神经心理学测试合理相关。总分和视觉感知子分数的几乎重叠结果源于测试的执行和评估方式。CDIS 和 GDS 之间的相关性证实了情绪对执行功能的重要性。