Suppr超能文献

一种光电肢体容积仪(肢体周径测量仪)的验证

Validation of an optoelectronic limb volumeter (Perometer).

作者信息

Stanton A W, Northfield J W, Holroyd B, Mortimer P S, Levick J R

机构信息

Department of Medicine, St. George's Hospital Medical School, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Lymphology. 1997 Jun;30(2):77-97.

PMID:9215977
Abstract

The Perometer, a device designed for the measurement of limb volume, has been rigorously assessed by comparison with other methods. Differences in the volume of geometric shapes and limbs determined by the Perometer and a tape measure/meter rule (i.e., Perometer minus direct measurement) were -0.8 to 2.4% (cylinders), -4.6% (truncated cone), -3.3% (mannequin limbs), 6.1% (normal human arms) and 6.8% (lymphedema arms). The larger differences were likely to be due to deviation from circular or elliptical cross-section (Perometer or tape method) and compression of the arm (tape method). Errors arising from incorrect positioning within the measuring frame were generally small, but large errors occurred when a cylinder was partially rotated within the frame (i.e., no longer perpendicular to the light beams). The Perometer was highly reproducible, each measurement taking only a few seconds. When recording the change in volume with time of a segment of arm during venous occlusion (blood flow measurement by venous occlusion plethysmography) using the Perometer plus a mercury strain gauge, between-method differences for individual blood flow recordings were apparent. The source of these differences is discussed. However, using the average of a number of blood flow recordings the Perometer and the strain gauge agreed fairly closely for both the normal and lymphedema arms. The Perometer is thus a reliable and convenient tool for the measurement of limb volume, and may also be used to measure the rate of swelling during venous occlusion plethysmography.

摘要

肢体体积测量仪是一种用于测量肢体体积的设备,已通过与其他方法进行比较得到了严格评估。用肢体体积测量仪和卷尺/米尺测定的几何形状及肢体体积差异(即肢体体积测量仪测量值减去直接测量值)在圆柱体中为-0.8%至2.4%,截头圆锥体中为-4.6%,人体模型肢体中为-3.3%,正常人体手臂中为6.1%,淋巴水肿手臂中为6.8%。较大的差异可能是由于偏离圆形或椭圆形横截面(肢体体积测量仪或卷尺法)以及手臂受压(卷尺法)所致。测量框架内定位不正确产生的误差通常较小,但当圆柱体在框架内部分旋转(即不再垂直于光束)时会出现较大误差。肢体体积测量仪具有高度的可重复性,每次测量仅需几秒钟。在使用肢体体积测量仪加汞应变仪记录静脉阻塞期间手臂某一段体积随时间的变化(通过静脉阻塞体积描记法测量血流)时,各个血流记录的方法间差异很明显。本文讨论了这些差异的来源。然而,使用多个血流记录的平均值时,肢体体积测量仪和应变仪在正常手臂和淋巴水肿手臂上的结果相当接近。因此,肢体体积测量仪是一种可靠且方便的肢体体积测量工具,也可用于测量静脉阻塞体积描记法期间的肿胀速率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验