• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公共与私立医疗服务提供者之间的合作:加利福尼亚州心理健康服务调查

Contracting between public and private providers: a survey of mental health services in California.

作者信息

Libby A M

机构信息

Center for Mental Health Services Research, Berkeley, CA 94720-5610, USA.

出版信息

Adm Policy Ment Health. 1997 Mar;24(4):323-38. doi: 10.1007/BF02042517.

DOI:10.1007/BF02042517
PMID:9217331
Abstract

This paper reports on a public authority's decision to "make" or "buy" mental health services. Data come from key informant interviews with California county contract or program managers. The questionnaire measures the extent of contracting and the importance of factors that are hypothesized to affect the relative costs of contracting. The percent of contracting by programs ranges from zero to 100, averaging 41%. Sixty-two percent of rural programs perceive little or no competition for public mental health contracts, and contract significantly less than urban programs. The extent of contracting is related to economic and public organizational factors.

摘要

本文报道了一个公共机构关于“自行提供”或“购买”心理健康服务的决定。数据来自对加利福尼亚州县合同或项目管理人员的关键信息提供者访谈。该问卷衡量了签约的程度以及假设会影响签约相对成本的因素的重要性。各项目的签约比例从0到100不等,平均为41%。62%的农村项目认为在公共心理健康合同方面几乎没有竞争或没有竞争,且签约比例明显低于城市项目。签约程度与经济和公共组织因素有关。

相似文献

1
Contracting between public and private providers: a survey of mental health services in California.公共与私立医疗服务提供者之间的合作:加利福尼亚州心理健康服务调查
Adm Policy Ment Health. 1997 Mar;24(4):323-38. doi: 10.1007/BF02042517.
2
Effects of contracting and local markets on costs of public mental health services in California.
Psychiatr Serv. 1998 Aug;49(8):1067-71. doi: 10.1176/ps.49.8.1067.
3
Contracting out of health services in developing countries.发展中国家医疗服务的外包
Health Policy Plan. 1994 Mar;9(1):25-30. doi: 10.1093/heapol/9.1.25.
4
The effect of contracting on the cost of public mental health services in California.合同承包对加利福尼亚州公共心理健康服务成本的影响。
Psychiatr Serv. 1996 Jan;47(1):32-4. doi: 10.1176/ps.47.1.32.
5
To contract or not to contract? Issues for low and middle income countries.签约还是不签约?中低收入国家面临的问题。
Health Policy Plan. 1998 Mar;13(1):32-40. doi: 10.1093/heapol/13.1.32.
6
Improving government health services through contract management: a case from Cambodia.通过合同管理改善政府卫生服务:柬埔寨的一个案例
Health Policy Plan. 2003 Mar;18(1):74-83. doi: 10.1093/heapol/18.1.74.
7
Institutional racism in public health contracting: Findings of a nationwide survey from New Zealand.公共卫生承包中的制度性种族主义:来自新西兰的全国性调查结果。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Feb;199:132-139. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.06.002. Epub 2017 Jun 3.
8
Why do states privatize mental health services? Six state experiences. The MEDSTAT Group.为何各州将心理健康服务私有化?六个州的经验。MEDSTAT集团。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1996 Winter;21(4):807-24.
9
Contracting between public agencies and private psychiatric inpatient facilities.公共机构与私立精神病住院设施之间的签约。
Med Care. 1991 Aug;29(8):766-74. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199108000-00009.
10
Protecting the public interest: issues in contracting managed behavioral health care.保护公众利益:管理式行为健康护理合同中的问题。
J Health Hum Serv Adm. 2000 Winter;23(3):306-23.