• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

北加利福尼亚州安乐死援助指南会议报告:定义、差异、趋同点与结论

Report of the Northern California Conference for Guidelines on Aid-in-Dying: definitions, differences, convergences, conclusions.

作者信息

Young E W, Marcus F S, Drought T, Mendiola M, Ciesielski-Carlucci C, Alpers A, Eaton M, Koenig B A, Loewy E, Raffin T A, Ross C

机构信息

Standford University Center for Biomedical Ethics, California, USA.

出版信息

West J Med. 1997 Jun;166(6):381-8.

PMID:9217449
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1304313/
Abstract

In September 1996, the Stanford University Center for Biomedical Ethics convened a conference entitled "Comprehensive Care of the Terminally Ill: The Northern California Consensus Development Conference for Guidelines on Aid-in-Dying." The regionally based, multidisciplinary conference gathered people from a variety of disciplines and diverse perspectives on physician aid-in-dying. This report documents important points of convergence, disagreement, and uncertainty that emerged from the conference and provides commentary on crucial issues: the definition of terminal illness, ensuring adequate palliative care, psychiatric challenges, coping with family pressures, the doctor-patient relationship, the managed care context, the role of ethics committees, and institutional challenges. Should physician aid-in-dying become a legal practice in California, the report will provide guidance to health care organizations, health professionals, and public policy officials engaged in local or state guideline or policy development.

摘要

1996年9月,斯坦福大学的生物医学伦理中心召开了一次会议,名为“晚期绝症患者的全面护理:北加利福尼亚关于临终关怀指南的共识发展会议”。这次以地区为基础的多学科会议汇聚了来自不同学科、对医生协助死亡持有不同观点的人士。本报告记录了会议中出现的重要共识、分歧和不确定性,并对关键问题进行了评论:绝症的定义、确保充分的姑息治疗、精神方面的挑战、应对家庭压力、医患关系、管理式医疗环境、伦理委员会的作用以及机构面临的挑战。如果医生协助死亡在加利福尼亚成为一种合法行为,本报告将为参与地方或州指南或政策制定的医疗保健组织、医疗专业人员和公共政策官员提供指导。

相似文献

1
Report of the Northern California Conference for Guidelines on Aid-in-Dying: definitions, differences, convergences, conclusions.北加利福尼亚州安乐死援助指南会议报告:定义、差异、趋同点与结论
West J Med. 1997 Jun;166(6):381-8.
2
The Northern California Conference for Guidelines on Aid-in-Dying.北加利福尼亚临终关怀指南会议
West J Med. 1997 Jun;166(6):379-80.
3
Are futile-care policies the answer? Providers struggle with decisions for patients near the end of life.
Hosp Health Netw. 1994 Feb 20;68(4):26-30, 32.
4
Physician-hastened death. Advisory guidelines for the San Francisco Bay area from the Bay Area Network of Ethics Committees.医生协助的死亡。旧金山湾区伦理委员会网络发布的旧金山湾区咨询指南。
West J Med. 1997 Jun;166(6):370-8.
5
Physician assisted aid in dying: a California proposal.医生协助的死亡援助:一项加利福尼亚州的提案。
Euthan Rev. 1988 Winter;2(4):207-59.
6
Death on the California ballot: giving healers the sanction to kill.加州选票上的死亡:给予治疗者杀人的许可。
Am Enterp. 1992 Sep-Oct;3(5):44-51.
7
Euthanasia and assisted dying: what is the current position and what are the key arguments informing the debate?安乐死和协助自杀:目前的立场是什么,有哪些关键论点影响了这场辩论?
J R Soc Med. 2018 Nov;111(11):407-413. doi: 10.1177/0141076818803452.
8
Ethical and legal issues in intensive care.重症监护中的伦理与法律问题
J Intensive Care Med. 1997 Nov-Dec;12(6):298-309. doi: 10.1177/088506669701200603.
9
Physician-hastened death and end-of-life care: development of a community-wide consensus statement and guidelines.医生加速死亡与临终关怀:制定全社区共识声明及指南。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1998 Spring;7(2):223-5. doi: 10.1017/s0963180198002199.
10
Evaluating outcomes in ethics consultation research.评估伦理咨询研究中的结果。
J Clin Ethics. 1996 Summer;7(2):127-38.

引用本文的文献

1
Views of United States physicians and members of the American Medical Association House of Delegates on physician-assisted suicide.美国医生及美国医学协会代表大会成员对医师协助自杀的看法。
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 May;16(5):290-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.04159.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Conscience, referral, and physician assisted suicide.
J Med Philos. 1993 Jun;18(3):323-8. doi: 10.1093/jmp/18.3.323.
2
Open letter from the Disability Discrimination Commissioner.残疾歧视问题专员的公开信。
Lamp. 1995 May;52(4):41-2.
3
Care of the hopelessly ill. Proposed clinical criteria for physician-assisted suicide.对绝症患者的护理。医师协助自杀的拟议临床标准。
N Engl J Med. 1992 Nov 5;327(19):1380-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199211053271911.
4
'Aid-in-dying' and the taking of human life.“辅助自杀”与夺取他人生命
J Med Ethics. 1992 Sep;18(3):128-34. doi: 10.1136/jme.18.3.128.