Kush F R, Sowers W
Staunton Clinic, Sewickley Valley Hospital, PA 15143, USA.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 1997 Jan-Feb;14(1):61-6. doi: 10.1016/s0740-5472(96)00067-0.
A total of 84 adult inpatient dual-diagnosis (cocaine dependence and unipolar depressive disorder) patients' charts were reviewed. Patients were administered the BDI, SCL-90-R with Additional Items for Major Depressive Syndrome, and the DAST-20 within 5 days of admission as standard assessment practice in a hospital program. Depression scores for the BDI and the SCL-90-R were generally consistent, respectively, across each of the depressive disorder diagnostic groups with the exception of organic (cocaine-induced) mood disorder, which had lower mean scores on both instruments. BDI mean score differences were statistically significant regarding the depressive and organic (substance-induced) patients. DAST-20 mean scores were consistent across the diagnostic groups (substantial drug abuse range). Results suggest potential discriminating ability of the BDI in particular in distinguishing genuine unipolar depressive disorders from organically (cocaine) induced mood symptomology when assessments are done rapidly following cocaine cessation.
共查阅了84名成年住院双诊断(可卡因依赖和单相抑郁症)患者的病历。作为医院项目的标准评估措施,患者在入院后5天内接受了贝克抑郁量表(BDI)、包含重性抑郁综合征附加项目的症状自评量表(SCL-90-R)以及药物滥用筛查测验(DAST-20)。除器质性(可卡因诱发)心境障碍外,BDI和SCL-90-R的抑郁评分在各抑郁症诊断组中总体上分别一致,而器质性(可卡因诱发)心境障碍在这两种量表上的平均分较低。BDI平均分在抑郁症患者和器质性(物质诱发)患者之间的差异具有统计学意义。DAST-20平均分在各诊断组中一致(药物滥用程度较高)。结果表明,特别是在可卡因戒断后迅速进行评估时,BDI具有潜在的鉴别能力,尤其可用于区分真正的单相抑郁症和器质性(可卡因)诱发的情绪症状。