• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈动脉内膜切除术后的血流动力学不稳定:危险因素及其与手术并发症的关联。

Hemodynamic instability after carotid endarterectomy: risk factors and associations with operative complications.

作者信息

Wong J H, Findlay J M, Suarez-Almazor M E

机构信息

Division of Neurosurgery, MacKenzie Health Sciences Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 1997 Jul;41(1):35-41; discussion 41-3. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199707000-00009.

DOI:10.1097/00006123-199707000-00009
PMID:9218293
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the incidences of hypertension, hypotension, and bradycardia after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and to identify any hemodynamic variables predictive of postoperative stroke, death, or cardiac complications.

METHODS

Retrospective population-based cohort study of 291 consecutive patients undergoing CEA using hospital chart review. Hemodynamic data collected from time of arrival in the recovery room until the end of the 1st postoperative day. Primary and secondary outcome events were stroke or death within 30 days of surgery and any postoperative cardiac complication (angina, congestive heart failure, dysrhythmia, or myocardial infarction), respectively.

RESULTS

The incidences of postoperative hypertension (systolic blood pressure > 220 mm Hg), hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 90 mm Hg), and bradycardia (pulse < 60 beats/min) were 9% (26 of 290 cases), 12% (36 of 290 cases), and 55% (159 of 290 cases), respectively. The stroke or death rate was 5.2% (15 of 291 cases). Postoperative hypertension was associated significantly with stroke or death (P = 0.04) and by a statistical trend with cardiac complications (P = 0.07). Independent preoperative risk factors for postoperative hypertension by multivariate analysis included angiographic intracranial carotid stenosis greater than 50%, cardiac dysrhythmia, preoperative systolic blood pressure greater than 160 mm Hg, neurological instability, and renal insufficiency. Postoperative hypotension and bradycardia did not correlate with primary or secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Hemodynamic instability was commonly observed after CEA, but only postoperative hypertension was associated with stroke or death and, possibly, with cardiac complications. Patients undergoing CEA, especially those at risk for postoperative hypertension, may be monitored best in settings suited to the expeditious management of neurological and cardiovascular emergencies.

摘要

目的

研究颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后高血压、低血压和心动过缓的发生率,并确定任何可预测术后中风、死亡或心脏并发症的血流动力学变量。

方法

采用医院病历回顾,对291例连续接受CEA的患者进行基于人群的回顾性队列研究。收集从进入恢复室到术后第1天结束时的血流动力学数据。主要和次要结局事件分别为术后30天内的中风或死亡以及任何术后心脏并发症(心绞痛、充血性心力衰竭、心律失常或心肌梗死)。

结果

术后高血压(收缩压>220 mmHg)、低血压(收缩压<90 mmHg)和心动过缓(脉搏<60次/分钟)的发生率分别为9%(290例中的26例)、12%(290例中的36例)和55%(290例中的159例)。中风或死亡率为5.2%(291例中的15例)。术后高血压与中风或死亡显著相关(P = 0.04),与心脏并发症有统计学趋势相关(P = 0.07)。多变量分析显示,术前高血压的独立危险因素包括血管造影显示颅内颈动脉狭窄大于50%、心脏心律失常、术前收缩压大于160 mmHg、神经功能不稳定和肾功能不全。术后低血压和心动过缓与主要或次要结局无关。

结论

CEA术后常见血流动力学不稳定,但只有术后高血压与中风或死亡相关,可能还与心脏并发症相关。接受CEA的患者,尤其是有术后高血压风险的患者,可能在适合快速处理神经和心血管紧急情况的环境中得到最佳监测。

相似文献

1
Hemodynamic instability after carotid endarterectomy: risk factors and associations with operative complications.颈动脉内膜切除术后的血流动力学不稳定:危险因素及其与手术并发症的关联。
Neurosurgery. 1997 Jul;41(1):35-41; discussion 41-3. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199707000-00009.
2
Hemodynamic instability after extracranial carotid stenting.颅外颈动脉支架置入术后的血流动力学不稳定
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2006 Jun;148(6):639-45. doi: 10.1007/s00701-006-0752-2. Epub 2006 Mar 8.
3
The effect of eversion and conventional-patch technique in carotid surgery on postoperative hypertension.外翻与常规 patched 技术在颈动脉手术中对术后高血压的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Jul;54(1):80-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.11.106. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
4
The need for treatment of hemodynamic instability following carotid endarterectomy is associated with increased perioperative and 1-year morbidity and mortality.颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后出现血流动力学不稳定的治疗需求与围手术期和 1 年的发病率和死亡率增加有关。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Jan;59(1):16-24.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.07.025. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
5
Does the technique of carotid endarterectomy determine postoperative hypertension?颈动脉内膜切除术的技术会决定术后高血压吗?
Ann Vasc Surg. 2015 Aug;29(6):1272-80. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2015.03.033. Epub 2015 May 22.
6
Perioperative baseline -blockers: An independent protective factor for post-carotid endarterectomy hypertension.围手术期基线β受体阻滞剂:颈动脉内膜切除术后高血压的独立保护因素。
Vascular. 2021 Apr;29(2):270-279. doi: 10.1177/1708538120946538. Epub 2020 Aug 9.
7
Systematic review and meta-analysis of postcarotid endarterectomy hypertension after eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy.外翻式与传统颈动脉内膜切除术术后颈动脉内膜切除术后高血压的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Mar;65(3):868-882. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.10.087.
8
Predictors and consequences of hemodynamic instability after carotid artery stenting.颈动脉支架置入术后血流动力学不稳定的预测因素及后果
Ann Vasc Surg. 2015 Aug;29(6):1281-5. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2015.03.035. Epub 2015 May 21.
9
Frequency and determinants of postprocedural hemodynamic instability after carotid angioplasty and stenting.颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术后血流动力学不稳定的发生率及决定因素
Stroke. 1999 Oct;30(10):2086-93. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.10.2086.
10
Hemodynamic changes in Chevalier eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy.Chevalier 外翻式与传统颈动脉内膜切除术的血流动力学变化。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014 Nov;48(5):514-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.08.005. Epub 2014 Sep 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Brazilian Angiology and Vascular Surgery Society Guidelines for the treatment of extracranial cerebrovascular disease.巴西血管病学与血管外科学会颅外脑血管疾病治疗指南
J Vasc Bras. 2024 May 31;23:e20230094. doi: 10.1590/1677-5449.202300942. eCollection 2024.
2
Redefining postoperative hypertension management in carotid surgery: a comprehensive analysis of blood pressure homeostasis and hyperperfusion syndrome in unilateral vs. bilateral carotid surgeries and implications for clinical practice.重新定义颈动脉手术中的术后高血压管理:对单侧与双侧颈动脉手术中血压稳态和高灌注综合征的综合分析及其对临床实践的意义。
Front Surg. 2024 Apr 4;11:1361963. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1361963. eCollection 2024.
3
Preoperative evaluation and perioperative management of patients undergoing major vascular surgery.
大血管手术患者的术前评估和围手术期管理。
Vasc Med. 2022 Oct;27(5):496-512. doi: 10.1177/1358863X221122552.
4
The Impact of Unilateral and Bilateral Eversion Carotid Endarterectomy on Postoperative Hemodynamic Parameters.单侧和双侧外翻颈动脉内膜切除术对术后血流动力学参数的影响。
Med Arch. 2021 Jun;75(3):194-198. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2021.75.194-198.
5
Luso-Brazilian Position Statement on Hypertensive Emergencies - 2020.《2020年葡语巴西裔关于高血压急症的立场声明》
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2020 Apr;114(4):736-751. doi: 10.36660/abc.20190731. Epub 2020 May 29.
6
Low-dose dexmedetomidine provides hemodynamics stabilization during emergence and recovery from general anesthesia in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy: a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.低剂量右美托咪定在颈动脉内膜切除术患者全麻苏醒和恢复期提供血流动力学稳定:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
J Anesth. 2019 Apr;33(2):266-272. doi: 10.1007/s00540-019-02612-w. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
7
[Postoperative blood pressure alterations after carotid endarterectomy : Implications of different reconstruction methods].[颈动脉内膜切除术术后血压变化:不同重建方法的影响]
Chirurg. 2018 Feb;89(2):123-130. doi: 10.1007/s00104-017-0502-4.
8
Diastolic Blood Pressure is a Risk Factor for Peri-procedural Stroke Following Carotid Endarterectomy in Asymptomatic Patients.舒张压是无症状患者颈动脉内膜切除术后围手术期卒中的一个危险因素。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017 May;53(5):626-631. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
9
Prediction of Prolonged Hemodynamic Instability During Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting.颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术中血流动力学长期不稳定的预测
Neurointervention. 2016 Sep;11(2):120-6. doi: 10.5469/neuroint.2016.11.2.120. Epub 2016 Sep 3.
10
Short and Long-Term Effect of Carotid Artery Stenting on Arterial Blood Pressure Measured through Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.通过动态血压监测评估颈动脉支架置入术对动脉血压的短期和长期影响。
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2016 May;32(3):343-50. doi: 10.6515/acs20150604a.