Suppr超能文献

[瑞士人群中问题饮酒的筛查:ISPA 开发的工具与 CAGE 问卷的比较。瑞士预防酒精中毒研究所]

[Screening for problem alcohol drinking in the Swiss population: comparison between an ISPA-developed instrument and the CAGE questionnaire. The Swiss Institute for the Prevention of Alcoholism].

作者信息

Truan P, Gmel G, François Y, Janin B

机构信息

Institut suisse de prévention de l'alcoolisme et autres toxicomanies (ISPA), Lausanne.

出版信息

Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1997 May 3;127(18):753-61.

PMID:9221487
Abstract

In 1987, the Swiss Institute for the Prevention of Alcohol and Drug Problems (SIPA) developed a set of questions on alcohol-related problems in the general population. The aim of this article is to study the results of the questionnaire used as a screening instrument to detect problem drinking in the Swiss population, and to compare it with the CAGE test. The sample consisted of 953 people aged 20 or over. Among the drinkers (89% of the sample), 91 males (21.7%) and 34 females (8.7%) had a positive SIPA test and 53 males (12.7%) and 17 females (4.3%) a positive CAGE test. The SIPA test was more sensitive than the CAGE in detecting persons who drink regularly and quite heavily but without binge drinking. The item "Eye-opener" of the CAGE is too blunt for application to the Swiss general population and could with advantage be removed from the questionnaire. Females tend to deny alcohol problems much more than males. Binge drinking increases the risk of a positive test (SIPA: OR: 1.9; i.c. 95%: 1.2-3.0; CAGE: OR: 3.3; i.c. 95%: 1.8-6.0). In short, the SIPA test is more suitable in estimating the number of problem drinkers in the Swiss population than the CAGE, which was initially developed for the American medical population. Furthermore, the results suggest the necessity of using a different cut-off for each gender.

摘要

1987年,瑞士酒精与药物问题预防研究所(SIPA)针对普通人群中与酒精相关的问题设计了一系列问题。本文旨在研究将该问卷用作筛查工具以检测瑞士人群中饮酒问题的结果,并将其与CAGE测试进行比较。样本由953名20岁及以上的人组成。在饮酒者中(占样本的89%),91名男性(21.7%)和34名女性(8.7%)的SIPA测试呈阳性,53名男性(12.7%)和17名女性(4.3%)的CAGE测试呈阳性。在检测有规律且大量饮酒但无暴饮行为的人群时,SIPA测试比CAGE测试更敏感。CAGE测试中的“晨饮”项目对于瑞士普通人群来说过于粗略,可从问卷中删除。女性比男性更倾向于否认酒精问题。暴饮会增加测试呈阳性的风险(SIPA:比值比:1.9;95%可信区间:1.2 - 3.0;CAGE:比值比:3.3;95%可信区间:1.8 - 6.0)。简而言之,在估计瑞士人群中饮酒问题者的数量方面,SIPA测试比最初为美国医学人群开发的CAGE测试更合适。此外,结果表明有必要针对不同性别采用不同的临界值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验