• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加拿大酒精障碍情况通过CAGE问卷来表明。

Alcohol disorders in Canada as indicated by the CAGE questionnaire.

作者信息

Poulin C, Webster I, Single E

机构信息

Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS.

出版信息

CMAJ. 1997 Dec 1;157(11):1529-35.

PMID:9400407
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1228563/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe alcohol disorders in the general Canadian population, using as a standard indicator the CAGE questionnaire (Have you felt you needed to cut down on your drinking? Have you felt annoyed by criticism of your drinking? Have you felt guilty about drinking? Have you felt you needed a drink first thing in the morning [eye-opener]?).

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of data from Canada's Alcohol and Other Drugs Survey (CADS), a national telephone survey conducted in 1994 of a representative sample of 12,155 people aged 15 years or more.

PARTICIPANTS

The CAGE questionnaire was administered to 5894 drinkers who had consumed alcohol in the 12 months before the CADS survey.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Respondents with positive (2 or more affirmative responses) and negative results on the CAGE questionnaire were compared as to demographic characteristics, alcohol consumption and harmful consequences of their drinking. Independent predictors of a positive result were identified by means of logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 5.8% of CAGE-tested current drinkers had a positive result on the past-year CAGE in 1994. The proportion of respondents reporting alcohol-related problems in one or more areas of their life was 7 times greater among drinkers with a positive result on the CAGE questionnaire than among those with a negative result (66.8% v. 9.5%) (p < 0.0001). When all demographic characteristics were controlled for simultaneously, male sex, residence in the Atlantic provinces, Quebec or the Prairies, single/never married or divorced/separated marital status, and low education level were found to be independent risk factors for a positive result on the CAGE questionnaire. About 85% of the respondents with a positive result had not sought help for their drinking. Applying the estimated sensitivity and specificity of the CAGE questionnaire in detecting alcohol dependence, as per criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, in a general US population, the authors estimated that 4.1% of Canadians had an alcohol dependence in 1994.

CONCLUSION

The large proportion of current drinkers with a positive result on the CAGE questionnaire who did not seek help for their drinking underscores the need for identification and brief interventions by physicians. Further research is needed to elucidate the underlying reasons for regional differences in CAGE status.

摘要

目的

以CAGE问卷(你是否觉得需要减少饮酒量?你是否因别人批评你的饮酒行为而感到恼怒?你是否为饮酒感到过内疚?你是否觉得早晨醒来第一件事就需要喝酒[即“开眼酒”]?)作为标准指标,描述加拿大普通人群中的酒精障碍情况。

设计

对加拿大酒精及其他药物调查(CADS)的数据进行二次分析,该调查是1994年开展的一项全国性电话调查,对象为12155名15岁及以上具有代表性的样本。

参与者

对在CADS调查前12个月内饮酒的5894名饮酒者进行CAGE问卷测试。

主要观察指标

比较CAGE问卷结果为阳性(2个或更多肯定回答)和阴性的受访者在人口统计学特征、酒精消费量及其饮酒的有害后果方面的情况。通过逻辑回归分析确定阳性结果的独立预测因素。

结果

在1994年接受CAGE测试的当前饮酒者中,共有5.8%的人在过去一年的CAGE问卷测试中结果为阳性。在生活的一个或多个方面报告有与酒精相关问题的受访者比例,在CAGE问卷结果为阳性的饮酒者中比结果为阴性的饮酒者高7倍(66.8%对9.5%)(p<0.0001)。当同时控制所有人口统计学特征时,发现男性、居住在大西洋省份、魁北克或大草原地区、单身/从未结婚或离婚/分居的婚姻状况以及低教育水平是CAGE问卷结果为阳性的独立危险因素。约85%结果为阳性的受访者未就其饮酒问题寻求过帮助。根据《诊断与统计手册》的标准,应用CAGE问卷在检测美国普通人群酒精依赖方面的估计敏感性和特异性,作者估计1994年有4.1%的加拿大人患有酒精依赖。

结论

大量CAGE问卷结果为阳性的当前饮酒者未就其饮酒问题寻求帮助,这突出表明医生需要进行识别和简短干预。需要进一步研究以阐明CAGE状态存在地区差异的潜在原因。

相似文献

1
Alcohol disorders in Canada as indicated by the CAGE questionnaire.加拿大酒精障碍情况通过CAGE问卷来表明。
CMAJ. 1997 Dec 1;157(11):1529-35.
2
Paradoxical increase of positive answers to the Cut-down, Annoyed, Guilt, Eye-opener (CAGE) questionnaire during a period of decreasing alcohol consumption: results from two population-based surveys in Ile-de-France, 1991 and 2005.在酒精消费量下降期间,戒酒、烦恼、内疚、警醒(CAGE)问卷的肯定回答出现反常增加:来自1991年和2005年法兰西岛地区两项基于人群的调查结果
Addiction. 2008 Apr;103(4):598-603. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.02120.x. Epub 2008 Feb 4.
3
Opportunities for alcohol screening and counseling in primary care.初级保健中酒精筛查与咨询的机会。
J Fam Pract. 1994 Jul;39(1):26-32.
4
Screening for alcohol-related problems in the general population using CAGE and DSM-IV: characteristics of congruently and incongruently identified participants.使用CAGE和《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版》(DSM-IV)对普通人群中的酒精相关问题进行筛查:一致和不一致识别出的参与者的特征。
Addict Behav. 2004 Jul;29(5):867-78. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.02.057.
5
Alcohol problems among patients attending five primary health care clinics in Harare city.哈拉雷市五家初级保健诊所患者中的酒精问题。
Cent Afr J Med. 1993 Feb;39(2):26-32.
6
Alcohol use disorders among US college students and their non-college-attending peers.美国大学生及其未上大学的同龄人中的酒精使用障碍
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Mar;62(3):321-7. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.3.321.
7
WHO/ISBRA Study on State and Trait Markers of Alcohol Use and Dependence: analysis of demographic, behavioral, physiologic, and drinking variables that contribute to dependence and seeking treatment. International Society on Biomedical Research on Alcoholism.世界卫生组织/国际酒精使用与依赖状态及特质标志物研究:对导致依赖和寻求治疗的人口统计学、行为学、生理学及饮酒变量的分析。国际酒精中毒生物医学研究学会。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2002 Jul;26(7):1047-61.
8
Screening for hazardous drinking. Using the CAGE and measures of alcohol consumption in family practice.有害饮酒筛查。在家庭医疗中使用CAGE问卷及酒精摄入量测量方法。
Can Fam Physician. 1994 Sep;40:1546-53.
9
Assessing alcohol consumption in general practice patients--a comparison between questionnaire and interview (findings of the Medical Research Council's general practice research framework study on lifestyle and health).评估全科医疗患者的饮酒情况——问卷调查与访谈的比较(医学研究委员会全科医疗研究框架关于生活方式与健康的研究结果)
Alcohol Alcohol. 1988;23(6):441-50.
10
Patterns of alcohol consumption in the Thai population: results of the National Household Survey of 2007.泰国人口的饮酒模式:2007 年全国家庭调查结果。
Alcohol Alcohol. 2010 May-Jun;45(3):278-85. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agq018. Epub 2010 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining Health Literacy Levels in Homeless Persons and Vulnerably Housed Persons with Mental Health Disorders.检查患有精神健康障碍的无家可归者和弱势住房者的健康素养水平。
Community Ment Health J. 2020 May;56(4):645-651. doi: 10.1007/s10597-019-00525-2. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
2
Adverse health behaviours are associated with depression and anxiety in multiple sclerosis: A prospective multisite study.不良健康行为与多发性硬化症中的抑郁和焦虑相关:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
Mult Scler. 2016 Apr;22(5):685-93. doi: 10.1177/1352458515599073. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
3
A personalized approach to assessing and managing pain in patients with cancer.一种针对癌症患者疼痛评估与管理的个性化方法。
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jun 1;32(16):1640-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.52.2508. Epub 2014 May 5.
4
Effects of a Web-based tailored intervention to reduce alcohol consumption in adults: randomized controlled trial.基于网络的个性化干预对减少成年人饮酒量的效果:随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Sep 17;15(9):e206. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2568.
5
Alcohol consumption and the CAGE questionnaire in Korean adults: results from the Second Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.韩国成年人的饮酒情况与CAGE问卷:第二次韩国国家健康与营养检查调查结果
J Korean Med Sci. 2008 Apr;23(2):199-206. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2008.23.2.199.
6
Childhood mental ability and adult alcohol intake and alcohol problems: the 1970 British cohort study.儿童期心理能力与成人饮酒量及酒精问题:1970年英国队列研究
Am J Public Health. 2008 Dec;98(12):2237-43. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.109488. Epub 2008 Jan 30.
7
Recursive partitioning models for linkage in COGA data.COGA 数据中连锁的递归分区模型。
BMC Genet. 2005 Dec 30;6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S38. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-6-S1-S38.
8
Alcohol problems and interest in self-help: a population study of Alberta adults.酒精问题与自助意愿:一项针对艾伯塔省成年人的人口研究。
Can J Public Health. 2004 Mar-Apr;95(2):127-32. doi: 10.1007/BF03405780.
9
Lifestyle health risk assessment. Do recently trained family physicians do it better?生活方式健康风险评估。近期接受培训的家庭医生在这方面做得更好吗?
Can Fam Physician. 2000 Aug;46:1609-16.
10
Do physicians assess lifestyle health risks during general medical examinations? A survey of general practitioners and obstetrician-gynecologists in Quebec.医生在普通医学检查中会评估生活方式健康风险吗?魁北克全科医生和妇产科医生的一项调查。
CMAJ. 1999 Jun 29;160(13):1830-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Rates of alcoholism in the United States of America, 1940-1948.1940 - 1948年美利坚合众国的酗酒率。
Q J Stud Alcohol. 1952 Mar;13(1):49-59.
2
The 1993 General Social Survey II: alcohol problems in Canada.1993年综合社会调查二:加拿大的酒精问题
Can J Public Health. 1995 Nov-Dec;86(6):402-7.
3
Recovery from alcohol problems with and without treatment: prevalence in two population surveys.有治疗和无治疗情况下酒精问题的康复情况:两项人群调查中的患病率
Am J Public Health. 1996 Jul;86(7):966-72. doi: 10.2105/ajph.86.7.966.
4
Analysis of cut points for screening instruments for alcohol problems in the emergency room.急诊室酒精问题筛查工具切点分析。
J Stud Alcohol. 1995 Nov;56(6):695-700. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1995.56.695.
5
Level of education and alcohol abuse and dependence in adulthood: a further inquiry.成年期的教育水平与酒精滥用及依赖:进一步探究
Am J Public Health. 1993 Jun;83(6):830-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.6.830.
6
Screening for heavy drinking and alcohol-related problems in young university students: the CAGE, the Mm-MAST and the trauma score questionnaires.对青年大学生进行酗酒及酒精相关问题筛查:CAGE问卷、Mm-MAST问卷及创伤评分问卷
J Stud Alcohol. 1993 Sep;54(5):528-33. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1993.54.528.
7
Detecting, preventing, and managing patients' alcohol problems.检测、预防和管理患者的酒精问题。
Can Fam Physician. 1994 Sep;40:1557-66.
8
Detection by the CAGE of alcoholism or heavy drinking in primary care outpatients and the general population.在基层医疗门诊患者和普通人群中通过CAGE法检测酒精成瘾或重度饮酒情况。
J Subst Abuse. 1994;6(2):123-35. doi: 10.1016/s0899-3289(94)90157-0.
9
Detecting alcoholism. The CAGE questionnaire.检测酒精成瘾。CAGE问卷。
JAMA. 1984 Oct 12;252(14):1905-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.252.14.1905.
10
Comparison of questionnaire and laboratory tests in the detection of excessive drinking and alcoholism.问卷调查与实验室检测在过量饮酒及酒精中毒检测中的比较
Lancet. 1982 Feb 6;1(8267):325-8. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(82)91579-3.