Dickey W, McMillan S A, McCrum E E, Evans A E
Department of Gastroenterology, Altnagelvin Hospital, Londonderry, UK.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1997 Jun;9(6):559-62. doi: 10.1097/00042737-199706000-00002.
Patients with selective immunoglobulin A (IgA) deficiency and coeliac disease, an established association, lack serum IgA class antigliadin and endomysial antibodies (AGA, EmA). Diagnostic protocols relying on AGA and EmA to select patients for small bowel biopsies will not identify these patients.
To determine whether total IgA should be routinely measured in patients, suspected of having coeliac disease as a supplementary screening test before biopsy.
Prospective measurement of IgA, AGA and EmA in patients undergoing small bowel biopsy for suspected coeliac disease.
We studied 318 patients suspected of having coeliac disease. Sera from 1959 controls in a random population sample were assayed as controls.
Thirty-one (10%) patients had villous atrophy, of whom 27 (87%) had EmA. Five (2%) of the 318 patients had undetectable total IgA (< 0.07 g/l): two (40%) of these five had villous atrophy in the setting of negative EmA. Use of undetectable IgA as a selection criterion for small bowel biopsy as well as positive EmA would have improved sensitivity from 87% (27/31) for EmA alone to 94% (29/31), with a fall in positive predictive value from 100% (27/27) to 91% (29/32), but would have maintained high specificity and negative predictive value. Serum IgA was undetectable in 5 (4%) of 117 patients with AGA in the range 0-10 ELISA units (EU) compared with none of 201 with higher AGA (P = 0.007, Fisher's exact test). Compared with controls who had AGA 0-10 EU, patients were more likely to have undetectable IgA (5/117 (4%) vs. 3/706 (0.4%); P = 0.005). Overall, the median IgA in patients with AGA 0-10 EU was lower than for those with AGA > 10 EU (1.89 g/l, vs. 2.34 g/l, P < 0.001).
There is an association between IgA deficiency and low/negative EmA/AGA. Routine measurement of total serum IgA in patients suspected of having coeliac disease, either with EmA or where AGA is low, improves selection of patients for small bowel biopsy.
选择性免疫球蛋白A(IgA)缺乏症患者与乳糜泻之间存在既定关联,这些患者缺乏血清IgA类抗麦胶蛋白和抗肌内膜抗体(AGA、EmA)。依靠AGA和EmA来选择患者进行小肠活检的诊断方案无法识别这些患者。
确定对于疑似患有乳糜泻的患者,在活检前作为补充筛查试验是否应常规检测总IgA。
对因疑似乳糜泻接受小肠活检的患者进行IgA、AGA和EmA的前瞻性检测。
我们研究了318例疑似患有乳糜泻的患者。对来自随机人群样本的1959名对照者的血清进行检测作为对照。
31例(10%)患者有绒毛萎缩,其中27例(87%)有EmA。318例患者中有5例(2%)总IgA检测不到(<0.07g/L):这5例中的2例(40%)在EmA阴性的情况下有绒毛萎缩。将检测不到的IgA作为小肠活检的选择标准以及EmA阳性,会使敏感性从单独EmA的87%(27/31)提高到94%(29/31),阳性预测值从100%(27/27)降至91%(29/32),但会保持高特异性和阴性预测值。在AGA范围为0 - 10酶联免疫吸附测定单位(EU)的117例患者中,有5例(4%)血清IgA检测不到,而AGA较高的201例患者中无一例检测不到(P = 0.007,Fisher精确检验)。与AGA为0 - 10 EU的对照者相比,患者更有可能检测不到IgA(5/117(4%)对3/706(0.4%);P = 0.005)。总体而言,AGA为0 - 10 EU的患者的IgA中位数低于AGA>10 EU的患者(1.89g/L对2.34g/L,P < 0.001)。
IgA缺乏与低/阴性EmA/AGA之间存在关联。对疑似患有乳糜泻的患者,无论EmA情况如何或AGA较低时,常规检测血清总IgA可改善小肠活检患者的选择。