Suppr超能文献

儿童乳糜泻的免疫学诊断:抗麦醇溶蛋白、抗网硬蛋白和抗肌内膜抗体之间的比较

Immunological diagnosis of childhood coeliac disease: comparison between antigliadin, antireticulin and antiendomysial antibodies.

作者信息

Lerner A, Kumar V, Iancu T C

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, Carmel Hospital, B. Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa.

出版信息

Clin Exp Immunol. 1994 Jan;95(1):78-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.1994.tb06018.x.

Abstract

The immunological markers proposed to supplement intestinal biopsy for the diagnosis of coeliac disease are antigliadin, antireticulin and antiendomysial antibodies. These antibodies have been studied separately or compared as pairs, but no prospective comparison of all three antibodies in childhood coeliac disease exists. Thirty-four confirmed coeliacs were compared with nine non-coeliacs with pathological small intestines, and 32 children with a normal intestinal histology. Sera were examined for IgG- and IgA-antigliadin antibodies (AGA) by ELISA, and for IgA-antireticulin antibodies (ARA) and IgA endomysial antibodies (EMA) by indirect immunofluorescence. In active coeliac disease, IgA-EMA was the most sensitive (97%), while IgA-AGA the least sensitive antibody (52%). The specificity of IgA-AGA, IgG-AGA, IgA-ARA, IgA-EMA was 95%, 92%, 100% and 98%, respectively. Positive predicted values of ARA and EMA were comparable (97-100%), while EMA had the highest negative predicted value (98%). Compared with IgG-AGA, IgA-EMA titres better reflected variations in dietary gluten, and correlated best with intestinal pathology. Compared with AGA and ARA sensitivity, specificity and predictive values, EMA is the most reliable serological marker for the diagnosis of coeliac disease. It reflects dietary changes in gluten and correlates best with intestinal histopathology. Therefore, it should be considered the best of the three serological tests available for childhood coeliac disease.

摘要

为辅助小肠活检诊断乳糜泻而提出的免疫标志物是抗麦醇溶蛋白、抗网硬蛋白和抗肌内膜抗体。这些抗体已分别进行研究或成对比较,但尚无关于儿童乳糜泻中这三种抗体的前瞻性比较。将34例确诊的乳糜泻患者与9例小肠病理异常的非乳糜泻患者以及32例小肠组织学正常的儿童进行比较。通过酶联免疫吸附测定法检测血清中的IgG和IgA抗麦醇溶蛋白抗体(AGA),通过间接免疫荧光法检测IgA抗网硬蛋白抗体(ARA)和IgA肌内膜抗体(EMA)。在活动性乳糜泻中,IgA-EMA最敏感(97%),而IgA-AGA最不敏感(52%)。IgA-AGA、IgG-AGA、IgA-ARA、IgA-EMA的特异性分别为95%、92%、100%和98%。ARA和EMA的阳性预测值相当(97%-100%),而EMA的阴性预测值最高(98%)。与IgG-AGA相比,IgA-EMA滴度能更好地反映饮食中麸质的变化,且与肠道病理相关性最佳。与AGA和ARA的敏感性、特异性及预测值相比,EMA是诊断乳糜泻最可靠的血清学标志物。它能反映麸质饮食变化,且与肠道组织病理学相关性最佳。因此,它应被视为儿童乳糜泻三种可用血清学检测中最佳的一种。

相似文献

4
Salivary antigliadin and antiendomysium antibodies in coeliac disease.
Scand J Immunol. 1999 Nov;50(5):528-35. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3083.1999.00606.x.
5
IgA antiendomysial antibody test. A step forward in celiac disease screening.
Dig Dis Sci. 1991 Jun;36(6):752-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01311232.
6
Celiac disease and type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus in childhood: follow-up study.
J Diabetes Complications. 1996 May-Jun;10(3):154-9. doi: 10.1016/1056-8727(96)00056-6.
7
Antiendomysium antibodies and coeliac disease: solved and unsolved questions. An Italian multicentre study.
Acta Paediatr. 1995 Oct;84(10):1125-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1995.tb13511.x.
8
[Comparison of IgA class reticulin and endomysial antibodies for the diagnosis and dietary control in celiac disease].
Arq Gastroenterol. 1999 Oct-Dec;36(4):177-84. doi: 10.1590/s0004-28031999000400004.
9
Association between anti-endomysial antibody and total intestinal villous atrophy in children with coeliac disease.
J Postgrad Med. 2003 Jan-Mar;49(1):21-4; discussion 24. doi: 10.4103/0022-3859.933.
10
Screening for asymptomatic celiac sprue in families.
J Clin Gastroenterol. 1995 Sep;21(2):130-3. doi: 10.1097/00004836-199509000-00013.

引用本文的文献

1
A laboratory test to detect gliadin-specific CD4 T-cells for difficult to diagnose celiac disease.
J Transl Autoimmun. 2025 Jul 24;11:100301. doi: 10.1016/j.jtauto.2025.100301. eCollection 2025 Dec.
2
Diagnosing coeliac disease: Out with the old and in with the new?
World J Gastroenterol. 2020 Jan 7;26(1):1-10. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i1.1.
3
The role of near-patient coeliac serology testing in the follow-up of patients with coeliac disease.
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2014 Jan;5(1):20-25. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2013-100342. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
4
Celiac disease: from etiological factors to evolving diagnostic approaches.
J Gastroenterol. 2017 Sep;52(9):1001-1012. doi: 10.1007/s00535-017-1357-7. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
5
Serum markers in the clinical management of celiac disease.
Dig Dis. 2015;33(2):236-243. doi: 10.1159/000371405. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
6
Consumption of gluten with gluten-degrading enzyme by celiac patients: a pilot-study.
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Sep 21;19(35):5837-47. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i35.5837.

本文引用的文献

1
IgA anti-gliadin antibodies in coeliac disease.
Clin Exp Immunol. 1981 Nov;46(2):286-93.
2
New immunofluorescent blood test for gluten sensitivity.
Arch Dis Child. 1981 Nov;56(11):864-8. doi: 10.1136/adc.56.11.864.
3
Gliadin antibodies in celiac disease.
J Pediatr. 1983 May;102(5):711-2. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(83)80239-x.
4
Influence of genetic factors on the serum levels of antigliadin antibodies in celiac disease.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1984 Jun;3(3):373-7. doi: 10.1097/00005176-198406000-00012.
5
IgA class endomysium antibodies in dermatitis herpetiformis and coeliac disease.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1983;420:325-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1983.tb22220.x.
6
Are antigliadin antibodies specific for celiac disease?
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1984 Nov;3(5):815. doi: 10.1097/00005176-198411000-00032.
7
Evaluation of a serum IgA-class reticulin antibody test for the detection of childhood celiac disease.
J Pediatr. 1984 Dec;105(6):901-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(84)80074-8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验