• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肾细胞癌异时性孤立性肝转移的手术治疗

Surgery for metachronous solitary liver metastases of renal cell carcinoma.

作者信息

Stief C G, Jáhne J, Hagemann J H, Kuczyk M, Jonas U

机构信息

Department of Urology, Medizinische Hochschule, Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

J Urol. 1997 Aug;158(2):375-7.

PMID:9224306
Abstract

PURPOSE

The postoperative outcome and survival of patients undergoing surgery for metachronous solitary liver metastases of renal cell carcinoma were evaluated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 1983 and 1993, 17 patients with metachronous liver metastases of renal cell carcinoma underwent laparotomy for metastatic liver disease. All patients had undergone radical nephrectomy a mean of 3.6 years before the diagnosis of liver metastases.

RESULTS

Surgical resection was feasible in 13 of 17 patients with right hemihepatectomy in 9 (3 multivisceral resections), wedge resection in 4 and ex situ (mobilization and eversion out of the abdomen) resection in 1. Stage R0 resection (complete removal, negative surgical margins with no macroscopic disease left behind) was possible in 11 of 13 cases (85%). In patients with metastatic liver tissue resection the mortality rate was 31% (4 of 13) with additional significant morbidity in another 2. Mean survival of patients with nonresectable disease was 4 months, which increased to 16 months after resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Complete resection of metachronous liver metastases can be achieved in the majority of patients. However, significant morbidity and mortality as well as the limited prognosis even after R0 resection strongly suggest careful patient selection.

摘要

目的

评估接受手术治疗肾细胞癌异时性孤立性肝转移患者的术后结局和生存率。

材料与方法

1983年至1993年间,17例肾细胞癌异时性肝转移患者因转移性肝病接受了剖腹手术。所有患者在诊断肝转移前平均3.6年已接受根治性肾切除术。

结果

17例患者中有13例可行手术切除,其中9例行右半肝切除术(3例为多脏器切除术),4例行楔形切除术,1例行体外(移出腹腔并外翻)切除术。13例中有11例(85%)可行R0期切除(完整切除,手术切缘阴性,无肉眼可见病灶残留)。肝转移组织切除患者的死亡率为31%(13例中的4例),另有2例出现严重并发症。不可切除疾病患者的平均生存期为4个月,切除后增至16个月。

结论

大多数患者可实现异时性肝转移的完整切除。然而,严重的发病率和死亡率以及即使R0切除后预后有限,强烈提示需谨慎选择患者。

相似文献

1
Surgery for metachronous solitary liver metastases of renal cell carcinoma.肾细胞癌异时性孤立性肝转移的手术治疗
J Urol. 1997 Aug;158(2):375-7.
2
Solitary liver metastasis of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma 20 years after nephrectomy treated by hepatic resection.肾切除术后20年出现的孤立性肝转移的嫌色细胞肾细胞癌,经肝切除治疗。
Urology. 2008 Jul;72(1):230.e5-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.11.134. Epub 2008 Mar 10.
3
Prognostic factors and survival after pulmonary resection of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.转移性肾细胞癌肺切除术后的预后因素与生存情况
Eur Urol. 2005 Jul;48(1):77-81; discussion 81-2. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.03.004. Epub 2005 Mar 20.
4
Surgical resection for management of renal cancer with hepatic involvement.手术切除治疗伴有肝转移的肾癌。
J Urol. 1995 Sep;154(3):972-4.
5
Hepatectomy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma.转移性肾细胞癌的肝切除术
Hepatogastroenterology. 1997 May-Jun;44(15):817-9.
6
[Liver resection in locally-spread and metastatic kidney cancer].
Urologiia. 2002 Mar-Apr(2):7-11.
7
Synchronous nephrectomy and right hepatectomy for metastatic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: report of a case and review of the literature.同步肾切除术和右肝切除术治疗转移性嗜铬细胞瘤性肾细胞癌:1例报告及文献复习
Chir Ital. 2007 Mar-Apr;59(2):257-61.
8
The therapeutic value of adrenalectomy in case of solitary metastatic spread originating from primary renal cell cancer.肾上腺切除术对原发性肾细胞癌孤立性转移扩散病例的治疗价值。
Eur Urol. 2005 Aug;48(2):252-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.04.004. Epub 2005 Apr 21.
9
[A case of surgical resection for metachronous multiple liver metastases of chromophobe cell renal carcinoma].
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1998 Oct;44(10):715-7.
10
Surgical resection of isolated retroperitoneal lymph node recurrence of renal cell carcinoma following nephrectomy.肾切除术后孤立性腹膜后淋巴结复发的肾细胞癌的手术切除
J Urol. 2008 Jul;180(1):99-103; discussion 103. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.03.025. Epub 2008 May 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Mining and validation of prognosis of various visceral metastasis in renal cell carcinoma: a study based on SEER database.肾细胞癌各种内脏转移预后的挖掘与验证:一项基于SEER数据库的研究
Updates Surg. 2024 Apr;76(2):657-676. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01703-4. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
2
Isolated soft tissue mass of the finger as the first presentation of oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma.手指孤立性软组织肿块为寡转移肾细胞癌的首发表现。
BMJ Case Rep. 2022 May 17;15(5):e248718. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2021-248718.
3
Metastasis-directed therapy for oligometastatic urological tumours: still no second-hand news.
寡转移性泌尿系统肿瘤的转移导向治疗:尚无二手消息。
Ecancermedicalscience. 2020 May 7;14:1036. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2020.1036. eCollection 2020.
4
Integrating metastasectomy and stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.在转移性肾细胞癌治疗中整合转移灶切除术和立体定向放射治疗
EJC Suppl. 2013 Sep;11(2):192-203. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcsup.2013.07.017.
5
Is there a role for systemic targeted therapy after surgical treatment for metastases of renal cell carcinoma?肾细胞癌转移灶手术治疗后全身靶向治疗是否有作用?
World J Nephrol. 2015 May 6;4(2):254-62. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v4.i2.254.
6
The benefits of liver resection for non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine liver metastases: a systematic review.非结直肠癌、非神经内分泌性肝转移瘤肝切除的获益:一项系统评价
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014 Dec;399(8):989-1000. doi: 10.1007/s00423-014-1241-3. Epub 2014 Aug 23.
7
Sunitinib treatment enabling resection of massive liver metastasis: a case report.舒尼替尼治疗使巨大肝转移灶得以切除:一例报告
J Med Case Rep. 2013 Oct 3;7:234. doi: 10.1186/1752-1947-7-234.
8
Liver directed therapy for renal cell carcinoma.肾细胞癌的肝脏靶向治疗。
J Cancer. 2012;3:184-90. doi: 10.7150/jca.4456. Epub 2012 Apr 20.
9
[Systemic and surgical management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma].[转移性肾细胞癌的系统治疗与外科治疗]
Urologe A. 2012 Feb;51(2):217-25. doi: 10.1007/s00120-011-2713-5.
10
Role of surgery in advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma.手术在晚期/转移性肾细胞癌中的作用。
Indian J Urol. 2010 Apr;26(2):167-76. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.65381.