Hilton S E, Maradit H, Möller H J
Department of Drug Regulatory Affairs, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland.
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1997;247(3):113-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03033064.
Serotonin syndrome is a potentially life-threatening complication of psychopharmacological drug therapy. The syndrome is produced most often by the concurrent use of two or more drugs that increase brainstem serotonin activity and is often unrecognized because of the varied and nonspecific nature of its symptomatology. Serotonin syndrome is characterized by alterations in cognition, behavior, autonomic nervous system function and neuromuscular activity. The purpose of this study was to investigate the possibility that any serotomimetic substance alone or in combination may give rise to serotonin syndrome, that this condition is not confined to the use of newly introduced substances, and that the newer reversible inhibitors of monoamine oxidase type A (RIMAs) are at decreased risk for this phenomenon than older, classical (irreversible) monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOI). This is a hypothesis-generating study based on a review of all published cases of adverse effects arising in patients receiving serotomimetic substances or combinations. A wide range of substances were involved in 226 cases published worldwide since 1950 where there was any use of single or combined serotomimetic treatments. Of the 226 cases, 105 fulfilled the Sternbach criteria for serotonin syndrome. Some classes of drugs and individual substances were more commonly represented. This may arise from product utilization patterns or from the specific properties of the individual products. However, moclobemide, a RIMA, was represented in only 9 of the 226 published cases and 3 of the 105 defined serotonin syndromes, either in multi-drug combinations and/or in mixed drug overdose. One explanation for the small number of cases involving RIMAs could be the reversibility of these new products. In addition the small number of reports on moclobemide could be an effect of its short availability in routine use during the period of the literature review. We conclude that a spectrum of serotonergic hyperactivity, through to a defined serotonin syndrome, may arise from the use or combination of any serotomimetic substance, as this is a consequence of the mechanism involved, rather than the use of any specific product such as the new antidepressants. We further conclude that this condition is not confined to the use of newly introduced substances and that the newer reversible inhibitors of monoamine oxidase type A (RIMAs) may be at decreased risk for this phenomenon than older, classical (irreversible) (MAOI). Given that a spectrum of serotonergic hyperactivity was observed, this analysis prompts redefinition of the currently accepted criteria for serotonin syndrome.
血清素综合征是精神药理学药物治疗中一种潜在的危及生命的并发症。该综合征最常由同时使用两种或更多种增加脑干血清素活性的药物引起,并且由于其症状的多样性和非特异性,往往未被识别。血清素综合征的特征是认知、行为、自主神经系统功能和神经肌肉活动的改变。本研究的目的是调查任何血清素模拟物质单独或联合使用是否可能引发血清素综合征,这种情况是否不仅限于使用新引入的物质,以及新型可逆性A型单胺氧化酶抑制剂(RIMAs)相比旧的经典(不可逆)单胺氧化酶抑制剂(MAOIs)发生这种现象的风险是否降低。这是一项基于对接受血清素模拟物质或联合用药患者中所有已发表不良反应病例的综述而产生假设的研究。自1950年以来,全球发表的226例病例涉及广泛的物质,这些病例中使用了单一或联合血清素模拟治疗。在这226例病例中,105例符合血清素综合征的斯特恩巴赫标准。某些药物类别和个别物质的代表性更强。这可能源于产品使用模式或个别产品的特定特性。然而,RIMA类药物吗氯贝胺在226例已发表病例中仅出现9例,在105例确诊的血清素综合征病例中仅出现3例,均为多药联合使用和/或混合药物过量的情况。涉及RIMAs的病例数量较少的一个解释可能是这些新产品的可逆性。此外,关于吗氯贝胺的报告数量较少可能是由于在文献综述期间其在常规使用中的可用性较短。我们得出结论,任何血清素模拟物质的使用或联合使用都可能引发一系列血清素能亢进,直至明确的血清素综合征,因为这是所涉及机制的结果,而非使用任何特定产品,如新型抗抑郁药。我们进一步得出结论,这种情况不仅限于使用新引入的物质,并且新型可逆性A型单胺氧化酶抑制剂(RIMAs)相比旧的经典(不可逆)单胺氧化酶抑制剂(MAOIs)发生这种现象的风险可能降低。鉴于观察到一系列血清素能亢进,该分析促使重新定义目前公认的血清素综合征标准。