Ryan M, Hughes J
Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen.
Health Econ. 1997 May-Jun;6(3):261-73. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(199705)6:3<261::aid-hec262>3.0.co;2-n.
To date, standard gamble, time trade-off, visual analogue and, more recently, willingness to pay, have been most commonly employed in health economics to assess utilities from various health care interventions. This article considers the use of conjoint analysis as an alternative technique to assess utilities. The technique is applied to assess women's preferences for the management of miscarriage. The paper addresses methodological issues in the application of the technique to health care and demonstrates its use in estimating willingness to pay and utilities. It is concluded that conjoint analysis is potentially a very useful tool and that future research should investigate more thoroughly the potential application of the technique in health economics.
迄今为止,标准博弈法、时间权衡法、视觉模拟法以及最近的支付意愿法,在健康经济学中最常用于评估各种医疗保健干预措施的效用。本文探讨了运用联合分析作为评估效用的替代技术。该技术被应用于评估女性对流产管理的偏好。本文阐述了将该技术应用于医疗保健时的方法学问题,并展示了其在估计支付意愿和效用方面的用途。得出的结论是,联合分析可能是一种非常有用的工具,未来的研究应更全面地调查该技术在健康经济学中的潜在应用。