Smith Lindsay F, Frost Julia, Levitas Ruth, Bradley Harriet, Garcia Jo
East Somerset Research Consortium, West Coker, Somerset.
Br J Gen Pract. 2006 Mar;56(524):198-205.
Miscarriage affects around one in six pregnancies. Much research has taken place identifying the consequences of this for parents but is mainly quantitative. Of the limited qualitative studies, none have explored women's experiences of the methods of miscarriage management received.
To assess the social and personal impact of different management methods (expectant, medical and surgical) on women's experience of first trimester miscarriage.
Qualitative interviews using a topic guide with a purposive cohort of four categories of women (each management method plus non-participants) 6 months to 1 year after first trimester miscarriage. Focus groups with both research participants and health workers.
Women from three hospitals in the South West of England that participated in the Miscarriage Treatment (MIST) trial.
Seventy-two interviews were undertaken between September 1999 and June 2000. There were also five focus groups (47 participants) and two feedback sessions (8 participants) with written feedback from 12 women. Interviews lasted 0.5-2.5 hours generating over 2000 A4 pages of transcripts. The transcripts were analysed for common themes, using standard proformas, which were filled in by individual team members and then discussed by the whole research team. Iterative readings in the light of new emerging issues ensured that new themes could be identified throughout the analytical process. All transcripts were then encoded for the identified themes using NUDIST.
Common themes emerged across all management options although some were specific to just one or two management options. The five major themes arising out of the data analysis were: intervention; experiences of care; finality; the 'baby'; and pain and bleeding.
Women's experiences and beliefs vary widely and their preferences need to be considered in their early miscarriage management. The three methods have different benefits and problems from the women's point of view. Competence and caring from professionals are especially important.
流产影响约六分之一的妊娠。已有大量研究确定了流产对父母的影响,但主要是定量研究。在有限的定性研究中,没有一项探讨过女性对所接受的流产处理方法的体验。
评估不同处理方法(期待疗法、药物流产和手术流产)对孕早期流产女性体验的社会和个人影响。
采用主题指南进行定性访谈,对四类女性(每种处理方法加上未参与者)进行有目的的队列研究,时间为孕早期流产后6个月至1年。与研究参与者和医护人员进行焦点小组讨论。
来自英格兰西南部三家医院参与流产治疗(MIST)试验的女性。
1999年9月至2000年6月期间进行了72次访谈。还进行了五次焦点小组讨论(47名参与者)和两次反馈会议(8名参与者),并收到了12名女性的书面反馈。访谈持续0.5 - 2.5小时,产生了超过2000页A4纸的文字记录。使用标准表格对文字记录进行分析,以找出共同主题,由团队成员分别填写,然后由整个研究团队进行讨论。根据新出现的问题反复阅读,确保在整个分析过程中能够识别新主题。然后使用NUDIST软件对所有文字记录中识别出的主题进行编码。
尽管有些主题仅特定于一两种处理方法,但所有处理方法都出现了共同主题。数据分析得出的五个主要主题是:干预;护理体验;终结感;“胎儿”;疼痛和出血。
女性的体验和信念差异很大,在早期流产处理中需要考虑她们的偏好。从女性的角度来看,这三种方法有不同的益处和问题。专业人员的能力和关怀尤为重要。