Nambiar P, Bridges T E, Brown K A
Forensic Odontology Unit, University of Adelaide, South Australia.
J Forensic Odontostomatol. 1995 Dec;13(2):18-25.
Bite marks left on human tissue and bitten material have become an important aspect of scientific evidence used for the conviction or acquittal of a suspect. Expert opinion has often been based on subjective comparisons rather than any objective metrical analysis and many experts will agree that there is a need to employ additional comparative tests to achieve unbiased objectivity in their investigation. In this study, an interactive shape analysis computer program ("SCIP"-Shape Comparison Interactive Program) has been employed in an attempt to derive experimentally a quantitative comparison, in the form of a Similarity Index (S.I.), between the "offender's" teeth and the bite marks produced on a standard flat wax form. The S.I. values obtained using "SCIP" were evaluated in a variety of experimental bite mark situations. It was found that in no case could the S.I. values produced by comparison of the bite mark with the dental casts from non-perpetrators be confused with the much lower S.I. from comparison of the bite mark with the dental cast of the perpetrator. The use of the Similarity Index derived using the "SCIP" program is recommended as a simple, accurate and objective means of comparing bite marks in suitable forensic cases.
留在人体组织和被咬物质上的咬痕已成为用于判定嫌疑人有罪或无罪的科学证据的一个重要方面。专家意见往往基于主观比较而非任何客观的度量分析,许多专家一致认为,有必要采用额外的比较测试,以便在调查中实现无偏见的客观性。在本研究中,使用了一个交互式形状分析计算机程序(“SCIP”-形状比较交互式程序),试图通过实验得出“作案者”牙齿与标准平面蜡模上产生的咬痕之间以相似性指数(S.I.)形式呈现的定量比较。在各种实验咬痕情况下对使用“SCIP”获得的S.I.值进行了评估。结果发现,在任何情况下,将咬痕与非作案者的牙模进行比较所产生的S.I.值都不会与将咬痕与作案者的牙模进行比较所得到的低得多的S.I.值相混淆。建议在合适的法医案件中,将使用“SCIP”程序得出的相似性指数作为一种简单、准确且客观的比较咬痕的方法。