• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乙酰甲胆碱激发试验:低起始第一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)的安全性。哮喘临床研究网络(ACRN)。

Methacholine challenge testing: safety of low starting FEV1. Asthma Clinical Research Network (ACRN).

作者信息

Martin R J, Wanger J S, Irvin C G, Bucher Bartelson B, Cherniack R M

机构信息

National Jewish Center for Immunology and Respiratory Medicine, Denver, CO 80206, USA.

出版信息

Chest. 1997 Jul;112(1):53-6. doi: 10.1378/chest.112.1.53.

DOI:10.1378/chest.112.1.53
PMID:9228357
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The lower limit for the baseline value to initiate methacholine bronchial hyperresponsiveness testing has not been well established. Recommendations have varied from > 1 L to above 80% of predicted. The objective was to determine if an FEV1 < 60% predicted was acceptable.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of challenges in 88 patients with a baseline FEV1 of < 60% predicted (mean=45.8%; range, 22 to 59%.

SETTING

Academic institutions.

RESULTS

There were only four individuals whose FEV1 did not return to > 90% of baseline following one poststudy beta2-agonist treatment. All four responded to a second treatment. There were no adverse sequelae following challenge in any individual. Neither age (up to 79 years) nor gender influenced outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

In chronic moderate to severe asthma, it appears that bronchial hyperresponsiveness testing can be safely performed even in those patients with a low baseline FEV1.

摘要

研究目的

启动乙酰甲胆碱支气管高反应性测试的基线值下限尚未明确确立。建议范围从大于1升至预测值的80%以上。目的是确定预测第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)<60%是否可接受。

设计

对88例基线FEV1<预测值60%(平均=45.8%;范围22%至59%)患者的激发试验进行回顾性分析。

地点

学术机构。

结果

仅4例患者在研究后接受一次β2受体激动剂治疗后FEV1未恢复至基线的>90%。所有4例对第二次治疗有反应。任何个体在激发试验后均无不良后遗症。年龄(最高79岁)和性别均不影响结果。

结论

在慢性中度至重度哮喘中,即使是基线FEV1较低的患者,似乎也可安全地进行支气管高反应性测试。

相似文献

1
Methacholine challenge testing: safety of low starting FEV1. Asthma Clinical Research Network (ACRN).乙酰甲胆碱激发试验:低起始第一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)的安全性。哮喘临床研究网络(ACRN)。
Chest. 1997 Jul;112(1):53-6. doi: 10.1378/chest.112.1.53.
2
Decreased bronchodilating effect of salbutamol in relieving methacholine induced moderate to severe bronchoconstriction during high dose treatment with long acting beta2 agonists.在长效β2激动剂高剂量治疗期间,沙丁胺醇缓解乙酰甲胆碱诱发的中度至重度支气管收缩的支气管扩张作用减弱。
Thorax. 2001 Jul;56(7):529-35. doi: 10.1136/thorax.56.7.529.
3
Diagnostic accuracy of methacholine challenge tests assessing airway hyperreactivity in asthmatic patients - a multifunctional approach.评估哮喘患者气道高反应性的乙酰甲胆碱激发试验的诊断准确性——一种多功能方法。
Respir Res. 2016 Nov 17;17(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12931-016-0470-0.
4
Provocative dose of methacholine causing a 20% drop in FEV1 should be used to interpret methacholine challenge tests with modern nebulizers.使用能使第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)下降20%的激发剂量的乙酰甲胆碱,来解读使用现代雾化器进行的乙酰甲胆碱激发试验。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015 Mar;12(3):357-63. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201409-433OC.
5
Methacholine challenge testing: improved patient comfort with a 2-tiered protocol.乙酰甲胆碱激发试验:采用两阶段方案提高患者舒适度。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2013 Jun;110(6):429-32. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2013.03.004. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
6
Current Asthma Prevalence Using Methacholine Challenge Test in Korean Children from 2010 to 2014.2010 年至 2014 年韩国儿童中使用乙酰甲胆碱激发试验的哮喘现患率。
J Korean Med Sci. 2021 May 17;36(19):e130. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e130.
7
Effect of long-term salmeterol therapy compared with as-needed albuterol use on airway hyperresponsiveness.与按需使用沙丁胺醇相比,长期使用沙美特罗治疗对气道高反应性的影响。
Chest. 1999 Sep;116(3):595-602. doi: 10.1378/chest.116.3.595.
8
Analysis of the contributing factors to airway hyperresponsiveness by a forced oscillation technique in patients with asthma.采用强迫振荡技术分析哮喘患者气道高反应性的影响因素。
Osaka City Med J. 2014 Dec;60(2):53-62.
9
Symptom evaluation during the methacholine test: Does it add to the interpretation of the test results based on the PC20FEV1?乙酰甲胆碱试验期间的症状评估:它是否有助于基于PC20FEV1对试验结果的解读?
Clin Respir J. 2018 Apr;12(4):1536-1544. doi: 10.1111/crj.12701. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
10
Baseline spirometry parameters as predictors of airway hyperreactivity in adults with suspected asthma.基础肺功能测定参数作为可疑哮喘成人气道高反应性的预测指标。
BMC Pulm Med. 2021 May 6;21(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12890-021-01506-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Bronchial challenge test in patients with a history suggestive of bronchial asthma with normal spirometric studies.对有支气管哮喘病史且肺量计检查正常的患者进行支气管激发试验。
Med J Armed Forces India. 2021 Jan;77(1):82-85. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2020.05.007. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
2
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Risk, Asthma Burden, and Lower Airway Inflammation in Adults in the Severe Asthma Research Program (SARP) II.严重哮喘研究项目(SARP)II中成人的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停风险、哮喘负担及下呼吸道炎症
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2015 Jul-Aug;3(4):566-75.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2015.04.002. Epub 2015 May 21.
3
The challenge of objective confirmation of asthma diagnosis in primary care.
基层医疗中哮喘诊断的客观确认面临的挑战。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2014 Jul 24;24:14032. doi: 10.1038/npjpcrm.2014.32.
4
Researching asthma across the ages: insights from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Asthma Network.研究哮喘的历史:美国国家心肺血液研究所哮喘网络的研究成果。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014 Jan;133(1):27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.10.026.
5
Asthma outcomes: pulmonary physiology.哮喘结局:肺生理学。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012 Mar;129(3 Suppl):S65-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.12.986.
6
Complexities of diagnosis and treatment of allergic respiratory disease in the elderly.老年过敏性呼吸道疾病的诊断与治疗复杂性
Drugs Aging. 2009;26(1):1-22. doi: 10.2165/0002512-200926010-00001.
7
Investigative bronchoprovocation and bronchoscopy in airway diseases.气道疾病中的支气管激发试验及支气管镜检查
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005 Oct 1;172(7):807-16. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200407-966WS. Epub 2005 Jul 14.
8
Discriminating measures of bronchodilator drug efficacy and potency.支气管扩张剂药物疗效和效能的鉴别指标。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001 Sep;52(3):245-53. doi: 10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01450.x.