Mutton D L, Scremin A M, Barstow T J, Scott M D, Kunkel C F, Cagle T G
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Service, West Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Medical Center, CA 90073, USA.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997 Jul;78(7):712-8. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(97)90078-2.
(1) To determine if a hybrid exercise (leg plus arm) training program performed immediately after functional electrical stimulation (FES) leg cycle exercise (LCE) training would further improve aerobic capacity when compared with FES leg cycle training alone, and (2) to compare the submaximal responses occurring during both FES-LCE alone and hybrid exercise in the same SCI subjects.
Nonrandomized control trial whereby subjects act as their own control.
Outpatient rehabilitation in a primary care hospital.
A volunteer sample (n = 11) of men 20 to 50 years old with complete spinal cord injury, free from cardiovascular and metabolic disease with spasticity.
Three phases of exercise training: phase I, progressive FES-LCE to 30 minutes of exercise (n = 11); phase II, 35.2 +/- 16.2 sessions of FES-LCE (n = 11); phase III, 41.4 +/- 17.7 30-minute sessions of hybrid exercise (n = 8).
(1) Aerobic capacity-a further increase after hybrid exercise when compared with FES-LCE alone; (2) submaximal physiologic parameters (oxygen uptake [VO2], heart rate [HR], blood lactate [BLa-])-measurement of these during constant work rate exercise and a training effect.
VO2 (the body's ability to utilize oxygen) significantly improved (p < .05) after both FES-LCE and then further after hybrid training. Hybrid exercise training resulted in significantly (p < .05) greater work rates and VO2 values than both FES-LCE at baseline and training work rates.
These subjects demonstrated that hybrid exercise performed twice a week provided sufficient intensity to improve aerobic capacity and provide a medium whereby patients with SCI can burn more calories than via FES-LCE alone. This has important implications for improving the health and fitness levels of individuals with SCI and may ultimately reduce their risk of cardiovascular disease.
(1)确定与单独进行功能性电刺激(FES)腿部循环训练相比,在FES腿部循环训练(LCE)后立即进行混合运动(腿部加手臂)训练计划是否能进一步提高有氧能力,以及(2)比较同一脊髓损伤(SCI)受试者在单独进行FES-LCE和混合运动期间出现的次最大反应。
非随机对照试验,受试者自身作为对照。
一家初级保健医院的门诊康复中心。
20至50岁患有完全性脊髓损伤、无心血管和代谢疾病且有痉挛的男性志愿者样本(n = 11)。
三个阶段的运动训练:第一阶段,渐进式FES-LCE至30分钟运动(n = 11);第二阶段,35.2±16.2次FES-LCE训练(n = 11);第三阶段,41.4±17.7次30分钟的混合运动训练(n = 8)。
(1)有氧能力——与单独进行FES-LCE相比,混合运动后进一步提高;(2)次最大生理参数(摄氧量[VO2]、心率[HR]、血乳酸[BLa-])——在恒定工作率运动期间测量这些参数以及训练效果。
FES-LCE后VO2(身体利用氧气的能力)显著改善(p < 0.05),混合训练后进一步改善。混合运动训练导致的工作率和VO2值在基线和训练工作率下均显著高于FES-LCE(p < 0.05)。
这些受试者表明,每周进行两次的混合运动提供了足够的强度来提高有氧能力,并为SCI患者提供了一种比单独通过FES-LCE燃烧更多卡路里的方式。这对于提高SCI患者的健康和体能水平具有重要意义,最终可能降低他们患心血管疾病的风险。