Hooker S P, Figoni S F, Rodgers M M, Glaser R M, Mathews T, Suryaprasad A G, Gupta S C
Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Dayton, OH 45428.
J Rehabil Res Dev. 1992 Summer;29(3):1-11. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.1992.07.0001.
This study determined the metabolic and hemodynamic responses in eight spinal cord injured (SCI) quadriplegics (C5-C8/T1) performing subpeak arm crank exercise (ACE) alone, subpeak functional electrical stimulation leg cycle exercise (FES-LCE) alone, and subpeak FES-LCE concurrent with subpeak ACE (hybrid exercise). Subjects completed 10 minutes of each exercise mode during which steady-state oxygen uptake (VO2), pulmonary ventilation (VE), heart rate (HR), cardiac output (CO), stroke volume (SV), mean arterial pressure (MAP), arteriovenous oxygen difference (a-v O2 diff), and total peripheral resistance (TPR) were determined. Although mean VO2 for both ACE alone and FES-LCE alone was matched at 0.66 l/mi, individualized power outputs ranged from 0-30 W (mean = 19.4 +/- 1.3) and 0-12.2 W (mean = 2.3 +/- 0.6), respectively. Hybrid exercise elicited significantly higher VO2 (by 54 percent), VE (by 39-53 percent), HR (by 19-33 percent), and CO (by 33-47 percent), and significantly lower TPR (by 21-34 percent) than ACE or FES-LCE performed alone (P less than or equal to 0.05). Stroke volume was similar between hybrid exercise and FES-LCE alone, and these two exercise modes evoked a significantly higher SV (by 41-56 percent) than during ACE alone. These data clearly demonstrate that hybrid exercise creates a higher aerobic metabolic demand and cardiac-volume load in SCI quadriplegics than either subpeak levels of ACE or FES-LCE performed separately. Therefore, hybrid exercise may provide more advantageous central cardiovascular training effects in quadriplegics than either ACE or FES-LCE alone.
本研究测定了8名脊髓损伤(SCI)四肢瘫痪患者(C5 - C8/T1)在单独进行次峰值手臂曲柄运动(ACE)、单独进行次峰值功能性电刺激腿部循环运动(FES - LCE)以及次峰值FES - LCE与次峰值ACE同时进行(混合运动)时的代谢和血流动力学反应。受试者在每种运动模式下完成10分钟运动,期间测定稳态摄氧量(VO2)、肺通气量(VE)、心率(HR)、心输出量(CO)、每搏输出量(SV)、平均动脉压(MAP)、动静脉氧差(a - v O2 diff)和总外周阻力(TPR)。尽管单独进行ACE和单独进行FES - LCE时的平均VO2均匹配为0.66升/分钟,但个体化功率输出分别为0 - 30瓦(平均 = 19.4±1.3)和0 - 12.2瓦(平均 = 2.3±0.6)。与单独进行ACE或FES - LCE相比,混合运动引起的VO2显著更高(高54%)、VE显著更高(高39 - 53%)、HR显著更高(高19 - 33%)、CO显著更高(高33 - 47%),且TPR显著更低(低21 - 34%)(P≤0.05)。混合运动与单独进行FES - LCE时的每搏输出量相似,且这两种运动模式引起的SV比单独进行ACE时显著更高(高41 - 56%)。这些数据清楚地表明,与单独进行次峰值水平的ACE或FES - LCE相比,混合运动在SCI四肢瘫痪患者中产生更高的有氧代谢需求和心脏容量负荷。因此,与单独进行ACE或FES - LCE相比,混合运动可能为四肢瘫痪患者提供更有利的中心心血管训练效果。