Suppr超能文献

视觉运动整合测试:与贝里-布克滕尼卡视觉运动整合发育测试比较中的结构效度

Test of visual-motor integration:: construct validity in a comparison with the Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration.

作者信息

Preda C

机构信息

Division of Behavioral and Developmental Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, UCSF-Mount Zion Medical Center 94115, USA.

出版信息

Percept Mot Skills. 1997 Jun;84(3 Pt 2):1439-43. doi: 10.2466/pms.1997.84.3c.1439.

Abstract

The 1996 Test of Visual-Motor Integration manual states that an adjusted correlation of .95 was obtained between this test and the Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration for 49 children with an average age of 9 years and that the adjusted .95 suggests equivalency of the tests. In the present study, for 103 children whose average age was 9 years, there was a correlation of .33 between the tests. Scores on the Beery-Buktenica test correlated more strongly than the Test of Visual-Motor Integration with both chronological age and academic achievement. Standard scorers for the latter test were high compared to those of the Beery-Buktenica test and the Comprehensive Test of Basic Skills. Interscorer agreement was significantly lower, and more time was required to score the protocols. This study indicates that the 1996 version is not a substitute for the Beery-Buktenica test.

摘要

《1996年视觉-运动整合测试手册》指出,对49名平均年龄为9岁的儿童进行测试,该测试与贝里-布克替尼卡视觉-运动整合发育测试之间的调整后相关性为0.95,调整后的0.95表明这两项测试等效。在本研究中,对103名平均年龄为9岁的儿童进行测试,两项测试之间的相关性为0.33。贝里-布克替尼卡测试的分数与实际年龄和学业成绩的相关性比视觉-运动整合测试更强。与贝里-布克替尼卡测试和基本技能综合测试相比,后一项测试的标准得分较高。评分者间的一致性显著较低,且对测试记录进行评分需要更多时间。本研究表明,1996年版测试不能替代贝里-布克替尼卡测试。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验