Preda C
Division of Behavioral and Developmental Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, UCSF-Mount Zion Medical Center 94115, USA.
Percept Mot Skills. 1997 Jun;84(3 Pt 2):1439-43. doi: 10.2466/pms.1997.84.3c.1439.
The 1996 Test of Visual-Motor Integration manual states that an adjusted correlation of .95 was obtained between this test and the Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration for 49 children with an average age of 9 years and that the adjusted .95 suggests equivalency of the tests. In the present study, for 103 children whose average age was 9 years, there was a correlation of .33 between the tests. Scores on the Beery-Buktenica test correlated more strongly than the Test of Visual-Motor Integration with both chronological age and academic achievement. Standard scorers for the latter test were high compared to those of the Beery-Buktenica test and the Comprehensive Test of Basic Skills. Interscorer agreement was significantly lower, and more time was required to score the protocols. This study indicates that the 1996 version is not a substitute for the Beery-Buktenica test.
《1996年视觉-运动整合测试手册》指出,对49名平均年龄为9岁的儿童进行测试,该测试与贝里-布克替尼卡视觉-运动整合发育测试之间的调整后相关性为0.95,调整后的0.95表明这两项测试等效。在本研究中,对103名平均年龄为9岁的儿童进行测试,两项测试之间的相关性为0.33。贝里-布克替尼卡测试的分数与实际年龄和学业成绩的相关性比视觉-运动整合测试更强。与贝里-布克替尼卡测试和基本技能综合测试相比,后一项测试的标准得分较高。评分者间的一致性显著较低,且对测试记录进行评分需要更多时间。本研究表明,1996年版测试不能替代贝里-布克替尼卡测试。