Neuropsychology Research Program, Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154-5030, USA.
Psychol Assess. 2011 Sep;23(3):805-9. doi: 10.1037/a0023370.
Evaluation of visuoconstructional abilities is a common part of clinical neuropsychological assessment, and the Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration (VMI; K. E. Beery & N. A. Beery, 2004) is often used for this purpose. However, few studies have examined its psychometric properties when used to assess children and adolescents with traumatic brain injury (TBI) or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), even though these are among the most common acquired and neurodevelopmental forms of brain dysfunction in children. This study examined the validity of VMI scores in 123 children with TBI and 65 with ADHD. The TBI and ADHD groups performed significantly worse than the standardization sample, obtaining VMI mean scores of 87.2 (SD = 13.7) and 93.5 (SD = 11.27). Previous research has noted decrements in visuoconstructional abilities in TBI but relative sparing in ADHD. To examine the criterion validity of VMI scores, the authors therefore compared these 2 groups. As anticipated, the TBI group performed significantly worse than the ADHD group, but receiver operator characteristic analysis indicated that VMI scores were poor at discriminating between groups. Nonetheless, convergent validity evidence supported interpretation of VMI scores as measuring perceptual organization in both groups. In particular, principal components analysis indicated that VMI total scores loaded with perceptual organization tests from the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, 3rd ed. (WISC-III; D. Wechsler, 1997), and its highest correlation was with the WISC-III Perceptual Organization Index. Also, the VMI correlated significantly with the Grooved Pegboard test for the group with TBI. These findings suggest that VMI scores are sensitive to visuoconstructional and motor deficits in children with developmental and acquired brain dysfunction.
视构造能力的评估是临床神经心理学评估的常见部分,而 Beery-Buktenica 发展性视觉运动整合测验(VMI;K. E. Beery 和 N. A. Beery,2004)常用于此目的。然而,很少有研究检查其在评估创伤性脑损伤(TBI)或注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)儿童时的心理测量特性,尽管这些是儿童最常见的获得性和神经发育性脑功能障碍形式之一。本研究检查了 123 名 TBI 儿童和 65 名 ADHD 儿童的 VMI 分数的有效性。TBI 和 ADHD 组的表现明显差于标准化样本,获得 VMI 平均得分为 87.2(SD=13.7)和 93.5(SD=11.27)。先前的研究注意到 TBI 中视构造能力的下降,但 ADHD 中相对较少。为了检查 VMI 分数的效标效度,作者比较了这 2 个组。正如预期的那样,TBI 组的表现明显差于 ADHD 组,但受试者工作特征分析表明 VMI 分数在区分两组方面效果不佳。尽管如此,会聚有效性证据支持将 VMI 分数解释为测量两组的知觉组织。特别是,主成分分析表明,VMI 总分与韦氏智力量表,第 3 版(WISC-III;D. Wechsler,1997)中的知觉组织测验相关,其相关性最高的是 WISC-III 知觉组织指数。此外,VMI 与 TBI 组的Grooved Pegboard 测试显著相关。这些发现表明,VMI 分数对发育和获得性脑功能障碍儿童的视构造和运动缺陷敏感。