• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不属于美国食品药品监督管理局日常检查范围的麻醉机设备的性能

Performance of anesthesia machines' devices that are not part of the Food and Drug Administration's daily checkout.

作者信息

Dexter F, Coffin S, Woodward J

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Monit. 1997 May;13(3):171-9. doi: 10.1023/a:1007302030065.

DOI:10.1023/a:1007302030065
PMID:9234086
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) checkout recommendations are to be applied, at least daily, on anesthesia machines. Devices included in the checkout are crucial to the safe operation of the machine. Remaining devices do not need to be checked as often. However, they should be checked at some appropriate interval. We calculated the reliability of the non-FDA checkout devices, to predict failure rates of these devices.

METHODS

The study included 36 North American Drager Narkomed anesthesia machines that were in service a total of 109,410 days at a university hospital. Reliability (i.e., statistical) analyses were done using in-house data recorded by biomedical technicians during 3359 monthly machine inspections. If any one device was operating outside of the limits of the manufacturer's specifications, the machine was labeled as having failed its inspection.

RESULTS

Assumptions of the failure analysis were satisfied. The mean time between failures equaled 1351 days or 3.7 years (lower 95% confidence bound 1123 days or 3.1 years). The mean daily probability of one or more devices failing to perform within the manufacturer's specification between inspections equaled 1.1, 2.2%, and 4.4% for inspections every 1, 2, or 4 months, respectively. Probabilities that a machine would fail on demand between inspections were approximately equal to the mean daily probabilities of machine failure. The mean number of days per year that a machine would be operating with a device that is outside of the limits of its specifications equaled 4, 8, and 12, days, respectively. The mean daily probabilities of failure and the probabilities of failure on demand were both directly proportional to the inspection interval.

CONCLUSIONS

Our failure analysis provides a rational basis for choosing an appropriate inspection interval for anesthesia machines' devices that are not included in the FDA's checkout recommendations.

摘要

目的

美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的检查建议应至少每天应用于麻醉机。检查中包括的设备对机器的安全运行至关重要。其余设备无需如此频繁地检查。然而,应在适当的间隔进行检查。我们计算了非FDA检查设备的可靠性,以预测这些设备的故障率。

方法

该研究纳入了36台北美Drager Narkomed麻醉机,这些麻醉机在一所大学医院共使用了109,410天。使用生物医学技术人员在3359次每月机器检查期间记录的内部数据进行可靠性(即统计)分析。如果任何一个设备的运行超出了制造商规格的范围,该机器即被标记为检查不合格。

结果

故障分析的假设得到满足。平均故障间隔时间为1351天或3.7年(95%置信下限为1123天或3.1年)。对于每1、2或4个月进行一次检查,在两次检查之间一个或多个设备未能在制造商规格范围内运行的平均每日概率分别为1.1%、2.2%和4.4%。机器在两次检查之间按需出现故障的概率大约等于机器故障的平均每日概率。每年一台机器使用超出其规格范围的设备运行的平均天数分别为4天、8天和12天。故障的平均每日概率和按需出现故障的概率均与检查间隔成正比。

结论

我们的故障分析为选择FDA检查建议未涵盖的麻醉机设备的适当检查间隔提供了合理依据。

相似文献

1
Performance of anesthesia machines' devices that are not part of the Food and Drug Administration's daily checkout.不属于美国食品药品监督管理局日常检查范围的麻醉机设备的性能
J Clin Monit. 1997 May;13(3):171-9. doi: 10.1023/a:1007302030065.
2
An evaluation of anesthesiologists' present checkout methods and the validity of the FDA checklist.麻醉医生当前核查方法及美国食品药品监督管理局清单有效性的评估。
Anesthesiology. 1991 Nov;75(5):724-9. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199111000-00002.
3
An assessment of the effectiveness of the revised FDA checklist.
AANA J. 1996 Jun;64(3):277-82.
4
Case report: automated machine checkout leaves an internal gas leak undetected: the need for complete checkout procedures.病例报告:自动化机器检查遗漏内部气体泄漏:需要完整的检查程序。
Anesth Analg. 2012 Jan;114(1):144-6. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182312c70. Epub 2011 Sep 29.
5
Preoperative checkout procedures for modern anesthesia machines in an emergency situation.
Can J Anaesth. 2003 Dec;50(10):1081; author reply 1081-2. doi: 10.1007/BF03018385.
6
Unclear methodology for anesthesia machine checkout.
Anesth Analg. 2007 Sep;105(3):891-2. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000269696.46440.5c.
7
Instructional review improves performance of anesthesia apparatus checkout procedures.
Anesth Analg. 1996 Sep;83(3):618-22. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199609000-00032.
8
An evaluation of a time-saving anaesthetic machine checkout procedure.一种节省时间的麻醉机检查程序的评估。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1994 Nov;11(6):493-8.
9
A prospective survey of veterinary anesthesia equipment in Alberta, Canada, using a standardized checkout procedure.采用标准化检查程序对加拿大艾伯塔省的兽医麻醉设备进行前瞻性调查。
Can Vet J. 2023 Feb;64(2):159-166.
10
Safe Medical Devices Act: management guidance for hospital compliance with the new FDA requirements.《安全医疗器械法案》:医院遵守美国食品药品监督管理局新要求的管理指南
Hosp Technol Ser. 1993 Oct;12(11):1-27.

引用本文的文献

1
[Economic benefits of overlapping induction: investigation using a computer simulation model].[重叠诱导的经济效益:使用计算机模拟模型的调查]
Anaesthesist. 2009 Jun;58(6):623-32. doi: 10.1007/s00101-009-1551-y.
2
Isolation and properties of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis biovar diacetylactis CNRZ 483 mutants producing diacetyl and acetoin from glucose.乳酸乳球菌乳酸亚种双乙酰变种CNRZ 483从葡萄糖产生双乙酰和乙偶姻的突变体的分离及特性
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997 Jun;63(6):2293-9. doi: 10.1128/aem.63.6.2293-2299.1997.

本文引用的文献

1
How to bring equipment maintenance costs under control.
Healthc Financ Manage. 1989 Sep;43(9):62-4, 66.
2
[Vaporizer malfunction--a cause of high concentration halothane vapor delivery].
Masui. 1994 Mar;43(3):421-5.
3
A random survey of anesthesia machines and ancillary monitors in 45 hospitals.对45家医院的麻醉机及辅助监测设备进行的随机调查。
Anesth Analg. 1988 Jul;67(7):644-9.
4
A little know-how can help reduce service costs.
Hospitals. 1991 Apr 5;65(7):68.
5
[Halothane-intoxication by failure of the halothane-vaporizer].
Prakt Anaesth. 1976 Aug;10(4):236-7.