Kumar V, Hintze M S, Jacob A M
Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City 52242.
Anesth Analg. 1988 Jul;67(7):644-9.
One hundred sixty-nine anesthesia machines and ancillary monitors were tested in 45 hospitals, randomly selected to assure a sample of hospitals with a wide range of anesthesia workload. The machines ranged in age from 1 to 28 years (8 +/- 6, mean +/- SD), with 47.3% manufactured since 1980, 39.1% between 1970 and 1980; and 13.6% before 1970. Regular maintenance was provided for 112 machines (66.2%) by the manufacturer, whereas 55 machines (32.5%) were maintained by independent contractors. Two machines designated as backup machines received no maintenance. There was no source of oxygen to back up oxygen piped from a central source on five machines. Thirteen machines had leaks over 500 ml/min distal to the common gas outlet, the most common sites being the carbon dioxide absorber, dome valves, and oxygen monitor sensor adaptors. Another two machines had leaks over 500 ml/min proximal to the common gas outlet. Forty-two of the 169 machines did not have an oxygen analyzer; another 18 had oxygen analyzers that did not function properly. Only 29 (23.5%) of 123 machines equipped with a ventilator had a working high-pressure alarm, whereas functioning low-pressure alarms were available on 104 machines (84.5%). Fourteen of the 383 vaporizers tested for calibration did not meet the calibration standard recommended by the manufacturers. None of the 32 liquid anesthetic samples collected and analyzed during the survey showed contaminants. Only four (8.8%) hospitals utilized a written anesthesia machine checklist. There was no correlation between the number of malfunctions observed and ages of the machines, although the older machines tended to lack the basic monitoring devices and safety features.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
在45家医院对169台麻醉机及辅助监测设备进行了测试,这些医院是随机选取的,以确保样本涵盖了麻醉工作量差异较大的各类医院。这些机器的使用年限从1年至28年不等(平均8年±标准差6年),其中47.3%是1980年以后生产的,39.1%是1970年至1980年间生产的,13.6%是1970年以前生产的。112台机器(66.2%)由制造商进行定期维护,而55台机器(32.5%)由独立承包商维护。有两台备用机器未进行维护。有五台机器没有来自中央气源的氧气备用气源。13台机器在共用气体出口远端的泄漏量超过500毫升/分钟,最常见的部位是二氧化碳吸收器、圆顶阀和氧气监测传感器适配器。另外两台机器在共用气体出口近端的泄漏量超过500毫升/分钟。169台机器中有42台没有氧气分析仪;另有18台氧气分析仪无法正常工作。在123台配备呼吸机的机器中,只有29台(23.5%)有能正常工作的高压警报,而104台机器(84.5%)有能正常工作的低压警报。在测试校准的383台蒸发器中,有14台未达到制造商推荐的校准标准。在调查期间收集并分析的32份液体麻醉剂样本中均未显示有污染物。只有四家(8.8%)医院使用书面的麻醉机检查表。观察到的故障数量与机器的使用年限之间没有相关性,不过较旧的机器往往缺少基本的监测设备和安全功能。(摘要截选至250词)