Roberts L W, Roberts B B, Warner T D, Solomon Z, Hardee J T, McCarty T
Department of Psychiatry, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, USA.
Arch Intern Med. 1997 Jul 28;157(14):1603-9.
Although studies have revealed conflicting attitudes within the medical community regarding assisted death practices in the United States, the views of current resident physicians have not been described.
To investigate the perspectives of residents from 3 medical specialty fields regarding the acceptability of assisted suicide and euthanasia practices as performed by 4 possible agents (the resident personally, a referral physician, physicians in general, or nonphysicians in general) in 6 patient scenarios.
An anonymous survey exploring responses to 6 patient vignettes was conducted with a convenience sample of all residents in the internal medicine, psychiatry, and emergency medicine training programs.
A total of 96 residents, 72% of those asked, participated in this study. Overall, residents expressed opposition or uncertainty regarding assisted suicide and euthanasia. The residents were disinclined to directly perform such practices themselves and did not support the conduct of assisted suicide practices by nonphysicians. Respondents were somewhat more accepting of other physicians' involvement in assisted death activities. Conflicting views were expressed by residents, with emergency medicine residents more likely to support assisted suicide practices in 4 of 6 patient vignettes than either internal medicine or psychiatry residents. Residents who reported being influenced by religious beliefs (21 respondents [22%]) did not support assisted death practices, whereas those influenced by personal philosophy (74 respondents [77%]) expressed less opposition.
This study explores the uncertainty and differing views of residents from 3 fields about physician-assisted suicide practices. Study findings are considered within the larger literature on clinician attitudes toward assisted suicide and euthanasia.
尽管研究揭示了美国医学界对辅助死亡行为存在相互矛盾的态度,但目前住院医师的观点尚未得到描述。
调查来自3个医学专业领域的住院医师对4种可能实施者(住院医师本人、转诊医生、一般医生或一般非医生)在6种患者场景下实施辅助自杀和安乐死行为的可接受性的看法。
对内科、精神病学和急诊医学培训项目中的所有住院医师进行便利抽样,开展一项匿名调查,以探究对6个患者案例的反应。
共有96名住院医师(占被询问者的72%)参与了本研究。总体而言,住院医师对辅助自杀和安乐死表示反对或不确定。住院医师不愿自己直接实施此类行为,也不支持非医生实施辅助自杀行为。受访者对其他医生参与辅助死亡活动的接受程度略高一些。住院医师表达了相互矛盾的观点,在6个患者案例中的4个案例中,急诊医学住院医师比内科或精神病学住院医师更有可能支持辅助自杀行为。报告受宗教信仰影响的住院医师(21名受访者[22%])不支持辅助死亡行为,而受个人哲学影响的住院医师(74名受访者[77%])表达的反对意见较少。
本研究探讨了3个领域的住院医师对医生协助自杀行为的不确定性和不同观点。在关于临床医生对辅助自杀和安乐死态度的更广泛文献中对研究结果进行了考量。